Why the modifier “fully” before the word successful?
Is it not: successful or not successful?
Drroringtons on
Blue Ghost becomes the first successful, fully private, lunar landing?
Decronym on
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|[CLPS](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkulmr „Last usage“)|[Commercial Lunar Payload Services](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Lunar_Payload_Services)|
|[IM](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkygtx „Last usage“)|Initial Mass deliverable to a given orbit, without accounting for fuel|
|[KSP](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkuv8k „Last usage“)|*Kerbal Space Program*, the rocketry simulator|
|[L1](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkvior „Last usage“)|[Lagrange Point](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point) 1 of a two-body system, between the bodies|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
The first commercial company to successfully land on the Moon is Intuitive Machines. On February 22, 2024, their Nova-C lander, named ‘Odysseus’, achieved a lunar touchdown, marking the first time a private entity accomplished this feat. This mission was a part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, underscoring the growing involvement of private companies in space exploration.
vovap_vovap on
I do not think you can say „private“ when NASA paid for it. Lender was designed by private company – that different story. F35 was designed by by private companies but nobody call it „private“ 🙂
IntGro0398 on
More data for centuries of moon exploration, living, station and mining.
Immediate-One3457 on
„Private“ isn’t SpaceX *heavily* government subsidized?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
7 Kommentare
Why the modifier “fully” before the word successful?
Is it not: successful or not successful?
Blue Ghost becomes the first successful, fully private, lunar landing?
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|[CLPS](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkulmr „Last usage“)|[Commercial Lunar Payload Services](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Lunar_Payload_Services)|
|[IM](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkygtx „Last usage“)|Initial Mass deliverable to a given orbit, without accounting for fuel|
|[KSP](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkuv8k „Last usage“)|*Kerbal Space Program*, the rocketry simulator|
|[L1](/r/Space/comments/1j1mkpm/stub/mfkvior „Last usage“)|[Lagrange Point](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point) 1 of a two-body system, between the bodies|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
—————-
^(4 acronyms in this thread; )[^(the most compressed thread commented on today)](/r/Space/comments/1izlqyo)^( has 19 acronyms.)
^([Thread #11107 for this sub, first seen 2nd Mar 2025, 09:55])
^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)
The first commercial company to successfully land on the Moon is Intuitive Machines. On February 22, 2024, their Nova-C lander, named ‘Odysseus’, achieved a lunar touchdown, marking the first time a private entity accomplished this feat. This mission was a part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, underscoring the growing involvement of private companies in space exploration.
I do not think you can say „private“ when NASA paid for it. Lender was designed by private company – that different story. F35 was designed by by private companies but nobody call it „private“ 🙂
More data for centuries of moon exploration, living, station and mining.
„Private“ isn’t SpaceX *heavily* government subsidized?