Share.

    40 Kommentare

    1. They will run a Trump speech through a Shannon filter and determine there is no actual information. The SN ration would likely cause them to doubt their own equipment.

      They’ll move on to the Dolphins and White Mice who likely have more interesting things to say. The Fjords of Norway will impress them.

    2. DisillusionedBook on

      Depends at what range.

      * At greater ranges we than the below we start to be a victim of the inevitable physics of the inverse square law, diffraction limits, etc..
      * More than a few hundred light years away they will likely not see us at all, or at best might be able to pickup some odd chemicals unlikely to be of natural origin we are putting into the atmosphere, e.g. industrial-level pollutants.
      * Closer than 100 light years they MIGHT be able to see some odd radio signals (if they have a massive dish that happens to point at the tiny needle in a haystack area of our solar system – i.e. they’d have to be surveying every area of their sky, also assuming we are not blocked from their line of sight by dense regions of the milky way) and they MIGHT figure out how to descramble those into meaningful pictures and sound.
      * Closer than 50 light years away they will probably know that we are a fucking mental species determined to kill each other, and will decide to keep the fuck away.

      All of this adds up to why it is also unlikely we will be able to find them!

    3. Mostly they would be surprised, but after analyzing our signals they would realize that there is no intelligent life here.

    4. one_pound_of_flesh on

      EM signals that don’t match known celestial sources. Same as what we are looking for.

    5. CoastPuzzleheaded513 on

      None. There is no intelligence here. It is a planet filled with idiots that are killing their own home and each other over „monopoly money“ to see who can have the most of it so they can be the biggest ape on the space rock.

    6. theanedditor on

      Atmospheric spectrum readings for manmade chemical traces. If their tech can pick it up, faint light on the darkside of the planet.

      Radio/broadcast signals are more just a buzzing once they’re out around Pluto, finding the radio messaging back and forth to Voyager(s) would be infinitesimally difficult to find, let alone pick up.

    7. physicalphysics314 on

      The correct response is radio bursts and gamma ray flashes from nuclear testing.

    8. livelaughlove631 on

      They would have picked up our radio waves long before they entered the solar system

    9. The most likely would be the presence of artificial light on the dark side of the planet. *We* can already detect differences in light transmission, reflectivity, and star dimming (from planets in other systems eclipsing their stars) well enough to roughly calculate the composition of atmosphere and size of those planets. That information would take many years to reach very far, but an advanced race within a reasonable number of light years shouldn’t have much trouble detecting the same from our own planet and noticing the anomalies. Of course, they could probably also detect radio and satellite transmissions as well but the question was about what they’d *see*.

    10. MrAmazingXD_ on

      Our math, and our progression into higher levels of math. I’m sure any species capable of traveling here would have ways to interpret our math.

    11. Raspberries-Are-Evil on

      If they are observing us from 20~100 light years away which would be extremely close, and assuming they have more advanced detection than we do- they would be seeing broadcast media from 1930s ish. If they examined and could get direct spectral imaging of Earth they would see CO2 and Methane in a Nitrogen and O2 atmosphere with water- which is a sign of life.

      If they watched us, as time went on they could see the rapid CO2 changes and of course increasing transmissions of radio waves.

    12. I don’t think they will see intelligent life before they will see President Trump.

    13. Holiday-Oil-882 on

      To think that space aliens are looking for us the way we are looking for them seems far fetched.

    14. I think it’s going to something that shows up on spectrometers as those have the greatest distance. Perhaps some artificial compounds that only occur artificially.

      Second would be radio transmissions. They would detect that long before they observe any physical surface or orbital items.

    15. It really does not matter, once they get a good look they will realise their mistake & move on.

    16. Zero. We’re doomed. Unfortunately, we would have to be a benefit to an intergalactic society.

    17. They would probably wonder why there is nuclear radiation eminating from most of the surface of the planet. „No….we were too late.“ (in some strange screeching alien language)

    18. An orange ape talking about curing a virus by drinking bleach and shoving a uv light up his butt.

    19. Substantial-Ant-9183 on

      Radio signnals most likely. They have been traveling at light speed for 100 years now

    20. Long-Aardvark3087 on

      When they see us drinking coffee .. they must be thinking “what black poison are these human drinking” … they must be crazy

    21. RedPandaM79 on

      Not from our governments LOL
      They will not find any intelligence there.

      Should they found much earlier our radio/tv transmissions? We are transmitting since more than a century. Even at a percent of speed of light, it should be “visible” over proxima centauri easily

    22. CrustyFlaming0 on

      “Look at those little ants running around. Oh cute! Look here’s a big fat orange one. Looks like that might be the king ant… don’t know why the soldier ants are killing all the worker ants though…”

    23. Aliens?
      Nah, their AI will observe our AI used by evil men to build FASCISM.

    24. jahchatelier on

      #[sighs and gets ready for downvotes](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/MUS8vOVV6W)

      Look, i know we all want to take the scientific high road and bury our heads in the sand we had airlifted into our „evidence based“ ivory towers of peer review, but one must at *least* consider the possibility that we are examining this whole question from an extremely biased and „human centric“ perspective.

    25. Wise_Use1012 on

      As long as they don’t look at america, china, russia or the northern half of korea. Then they might see some intelligence.

    Leave A Reply