Submission Statement: „As talk of possible peace in Ukraine gets louder, a plan to keep it is urgently needed. Where would peacekeepers come from, and what orders would they have?“ Volodymyr Dubovyk outlines the urgent need for a comprehensive plan to establish peace in Ukraine amid ongoing hostilities. With the ongoing challenges of deploying peacekeepers, the scale of military presence required, and the political dynamics surrounding security guarantees, a credible peacekeeping force, possibly led by European NATO members, is essential for a stable resolution. The negotiations will also heavily depend on battlefield developments, making sustained military support to Ukraine crucial.
Lost-Jeweler-274 on
A worthless article about something that will be vetoed by the Russians, the only way NATO could of involved itself was back in 22 at the high point of the Ukrainian offensive.
Mediocre_Painting263 on
How peace *should* be kept, and how it *will* be kept is entirely different.
It *should* be a multinational coalition of the willing, with militaries across Europe rotating brigades in and out of a new DMZ.
It will likely consist of none of that, because Russia will never accept it and Trump wants the war to end. In all likelihood, it’ll be a static frontline with the outbreak of gunfire. Culminating in Ukraine coincidentally deciding to kill a bunch of Russians for some reason, giving Russia justification to go back in, coincidentally right after it’s just rebuilt and restructured its entire military.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
3 Kommentare
Submission Statement: „As talk of possible peace in Ukraine gets louder, a plan to keep it is urgently needed. Where would peacekeepers come from, and what orders would they have?“ Volodymyr Dubovyk outlines the urgent need for a comprehensive plan to establish peace in Ukraine amid ongoing hostilities. With the ongoing challenges of deploying peacekeepers, the scale of military presence required, and the political dynamics surrounding security guarantees, a credible peacekeeping force, possibly led by European NATO members, is essential for a stable resolution. The negotiations will also heavily depend on battlefield developments, making sustained military support to Ukraine crucial.
A worthless article about something that will be vetoed by the Russians, the only way NATO could of involved itself was back in 22 at the high point of the Ukrainian offensive.
How peace *should* be kept, and how it *will* be kept is entirely different.
It *should* be a multinational coalition of the willing, with militaries across Europe rotating brigades in and out of a new DMZ.
It will likely consist of none of that, because Russia will never accept it and Trump wants the war to end. In all likelihood, it’ll be a static frontline with the outbreak of gunfire. Culminating in Ukraine coincidentally deciding to kill a bunch of Russians for some reason, giving Russia justification to go back in, coincidentally right after it’s just rebuilt and restructured its entire military.