Supermassive schwarze Löcher in ‚Little Red Dot‘ Galaxien sind 1.000 -mal größer als sie sein sollten, und Astronomen wissen nicht warum
https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-overlymassive-black-holes
Supermassive schwarze Löcher in ‚Little Red Dot‘ Galaxien sind 1.000 -mal größer als sie sein sollten, und Astronomen wissen nicht warum
https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-overlymassive-black-holes
7 Kommentare
I know the answer but no one is going to like it.
Could it be… they’re so big because they ate all the matter of their galaxies and that’s why the galaxy is small but the hole is big?
It might be so simple that the hyper-complex scientists simply overlooked its simplicity.
My question is, are the SMBHs extra massive compared to nearby ones or are their galaxies really small?
Maybe cause they are sucking up matter faster than we know and are growing rapidly by the time we see em.
Someone is getting an ‚F‘ grade on their Early Universe theory.
All these astronomers should get a new job. They don’t seem to know any /s
Black holes don’t “suck” up matter. Anything outside the event horizon will just orbit it assuming it’s close enough to be gravitationally bound to the black hole. And most stars in a galaxy are not bound to the SMBH in the center; they orbit the combined center of mass of the entire galaxy. SMBHs wind up in the center of galaxies through other interactions; the galaxy doesn’t orbit it though except for the relatively close stars.
Objects will stay in orbit just like they would a star unless something happens to destabilize them and lose angular momentum, then they could fall towards it but will still most likely wind up in the accretion disk for quite a long time.