Share.

    10 Kommentare

    1. Their effort looks a lot cooler than the original (I assume the b&w photo is the original).

    2. neurosci_student on

      I know it’s subjective, but this feels more beautiful and spectacular than the black and white “real” image, both because of it’s colorful, more artistic styling, but also because of the human handwork that can visibly be seen in the result. Truly the first human-made image from another world.

    3. LordByronsCup on

      C’mon, can’t tell me none of the artists threw in a few joke slides.

    4. Computers were slower back then, but apparently the data values were already available to them to draw by hand. how could it possibly have taken longer for the computer to convert a brightness value to a shaded pixel than for the researchers to measure out the pixels and color it by hand?

    5. neanderthalman on

      It might not have been the straight processing power needed. This seems to be very doable even on primitive computers. The delay they probably didn’t want to wait for was *waiting their turn* to use the computer for this.

      Imagine, for the sake of argument it would have taken just seconds, even near instantaneously – but if it’s low priority you might have waited weeks in the queue just to get your few seconds on the computer.

    6. Well, that definitely looks like the work of an impatient scientist. It belongs in an museum!

    7. SpaceInMyBrain on

      I think Scott Manley may have done a YT video on this. Nice further info for those interested.

    8. clandestineVexation on

      Misleading title. They didn’t “have” to, they were just impatient.

    Leave A Reply