Ich frage das nicht aus der Perspektive eines Aluhuts, sondern eher als ernst gemeinte Frage. Ich habe kürzlich einen Nachrichtenartikel gesehen, in dem stand, dass alle Beiträge/Likes, die "Terrorismus" wird als Grundlage für die Entscheidung über die Abschiebung einer Person verwendet.
Kann die Regierung jedoch meine Online-Aktivitäten ständig überwachen? Verstehen Sie mich nicht falsch, ich persönlich bin von dieser Regelung nicht betroffen, da ich ohnehin nicht auf der Seite solcher Ansichten stehe. Es erscheint jedoch ein wenig unethisch, wenn die Regierung entscheiden darf, was als Terrorismus eingestuft werden kann und was nicht. Wenn sich die derzeit regierende Partei bedroht fühlt, kann sie sogar Kritik an ihrer Regierung im Internet überwachen und einige Teile davon für illegal erklären.
Denke ich zu viel darüber nach, oder kommt mir dieser Schritt eher wie eine Sache des Autoritarismus vor?
https://old.reddit.com/r/germany/comments/1dpku17/how_do_the_data_privacy_laws_work_with_regards_to/
Von hades2enthusiast
5 Kommentare
**Have you read our extensive wiki yet? It answers many basic questions, and it contains in-depth articles on many frequently discussed topics.
[Check our wiki now!](https://www.reddit.com/r/germany/wiki/index)**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/germany) if you have any questions or concerns.*
They’re not monitoring non public stuff all the time, only if there’s a suspicion of an offense they’ll obtain court order to hand over the private records. For public stuff visible to everyone some of it is monitored, some isn’t, and some is just collected but not actively evaluated.
In general though government simply has more power to decide what’s allowed and what no, that’s why taking photos in public can end up in court to clarify whether it’s allowed or not, and meanwhile government put up so many cameras in Berlin that it’s one of the most surveilled cities in Europe .
>However, it appears a bit unethical if the government gets to decide what can and cannot be determined as terrorism.
German laws decide what is support of terrorism.
And no the government does not „monitor the internet“. But if someone reports someone writing stuff that breaks the law or if you’re screened during a vetting process and it is found out that you wrote shit you get consequences.
Privacy does not come into play, as the article says, it’s about social media likes, which is a form of publication (*public* being the operative component).
It doesn’t make it less of a problematic law, as the criticism section at the end also explains, but it doesn’t look to be a law that requires particularly invasive surveillance.
The threshold for tapping into your communication is very high and only individuals who show signs of being a potential threat are monitored closer (as far as I know). Typically these individuals are communicating with already known groups or other potential threats. Or the government gets information from their partners on an individual or group. I assume that’s how you end on a list.
I haven’t read the draft law so I cannot comment on it.