https://www.liikenneturva.fi/en/campaigns/kennen-sie-die-verkehrsregeln/#84cde76e
(Radfahrer müssen an Zebrastreifen Vorfahrt gewähren. – Britisches Englisch.)
Ich fand das sehr interessant, da ich bisher an Zebrastreifen immer Radfahrern Vorfahrt gewährt habe, es aber so aussieht, als hätten Autos Vorfahrt.
Dies gilt nicht, wenn am Übergang ein Schild mit der Aufschrift „Fahrrädern Vorfahrt gewähren“ steht. Oder wenn Sie abbiegen.
https://i.redd.it/prq7rhf7765d1.jpeg
Von olenamerikkalainen
7 Kommentare
Noy only ”give way to cyclists sign” but also a STOP or yield sign.
Also doesn’t apply when the car changes direction at a junction.
I usually also let them pass because making them dismount to walk is worse for everyone. Unless they appear too quickly. And I think that’s why the rule is as it is. There’s more time for a car to see and react to a pedestrian than a cyclist.
I still do give way sometimes even though I should have the right, better to be safe than sorry and have a cycle slam into the side of the car. I would’ve been right to just keep driving but then I’d need to deal with all the hassle of a cyclist getting hurt and the car getting scratches
So get off your bike and walk across. Then you are a pedestrian. Get back on when you’re across.
I was taught that if the zebra crossing does not indicate continued cycling lane (as on the left picture) you are actually supposed to walk your bike over it. Don’t know if this has changed though.
Technically this is correct, they should not be given way when crossing the road using a pedestrian crossing without getting off the bike, but knowing cyclists, I rather give them way
In practice it’s more common that cars have to yield, either when they’re turning, or due to a give way sign. But it’s true, when there’s a zebra crossing on the road like that, cyclists have to give way.