Pretty likely id say. Especially with current government.
Subsidized housing is for people who can’t afford other housing, i.e. low income people. Not for people who’ve had a low income and stayed there a long time while significantly increasing their income.
k-one-0-two on
populism at it’s best. or worst, which is the same thing.
MaddogFinland on
The subsidy is only for those who genuinely need it. If you earn more than allowed you need to lose the subsidy. This has nothing to do with populism, it’s basic common sense in an age where budget shortfalls are a yearly problem. The social system is meant to be a safety net, not a freaking hammock
red-at-night on
We should be helping those in need, so if somebody earns past the threshold, why shouldn’t they have to move in favor of somebody who doesn’t?
This is so stupid. Do overtime and you might lose your home. Personally I would rather be unemployed than move from home where I have been living for over decade.
ms_sapien on
What is the current house hold income threshold to get in Heka housing?
Anaalirankaisija on
What, if earning 3540€, or bit less, can have subsided housing, wow, who earns these amounts
6020€ for two adults, ohh nice, and bonus subsided housing, incredible
EuroFederalist on
If you are unemployed and want full housing benefits you must have less than 10.000€ in your bank account(s). Otherwise it drops a lot
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
9 Kommentare
Pretty likely id say. Especially with current government.
Subsidized housing is for people who can’t afford other housing, i.e. low income people. Not for people who’ve had a low income and stayed there a long time while significantly increasing their income.
populism at it’s best. or worst, which is the same thing.
The subsidy is only for those who genuinely need it. If you earn more than allowed you need to lose the subsidy. This has nothing to do with populism, it’s basic common sense in an age where budget shortfalls are a yearly problem. The social system is meant to be a safety net, not a freaking hammock
We should be helping those in need, so if somebody earns past the threshold, why shouldn’t they have to move in favor of somebody who doesn’t?
Current government rare W.
There kinda are income and wealth limits already. However only when you move in.
https://www.sato.fi/en/faq-rental-apartments/finding-a-home/state-subsidised-apartments
This is so stupid. Do overtime and you might lose your home. Personally I would rather be unemployed than move from home where I have been living for over decade.
What is the current house hold income threshold to get in Heka housing?
What, if earning 3540€, or bit less, can have subsided housing, wow, who earns these amounts
6020€ for two adults, ohh nice, and bonus subsided housing, incredible
If you are unemployed and want full housing benefits you must have less than 10.000€ in your bank account(s). Otherwise it drops a lot