Hierbei wird der Einführungspreis des Produkts verwendet und die Wertentwicklung der Aktien des Unternehmens (Split und Dividendenanpassung) seit dem Einführungsdatum angewendet. Unternehmen, die zum Start nicht börsennotiert waren, wurden ausgeschlossen. Viele weitere Produkte und die vollständige Methodik finden Sie unter investedinstead.com
Von googleme
8 Kommentare
Ooo I haven’t been relevant for a long time. Feels weird.
The use of wildly different periods for each product negates the comparison. How about “what if you held the stock for ten years”?
I remember doing this when my Apple Cube with big CRT died after 12 years. Those 12 years encompassed the release of the IPod, IPhone and IPad and the $3000 or so I spent on the hardware would have yielded over $300,000.
Apple should be the Apple II or original iPhone
I quite dislike this is sorted by relative return and not by something related to the title. Even worse the metric of the title is visually less prominent than both the total multiple as well as the yearly return, which is just equivalent with the stock. The product price is just a side info rather than what the graph is about. You either picked the wrong title or a bad way of representing the data.
Comparisons and time frames don’t make any sense – might as well be random.
Does this account for stock splits?
If only I bought Monster when I was 12.