Share.

    2 Kommentare

    1. themildproximity on

      The intern angle is what makes this stand out. Someone with that level of access presumably went through background checks before stepping into NATO HQ in Brussels, so either vetting failed or recruitment happened after placement. Canada being one of the original 12 signatories in 1949 adds another wrinkle, since allied-on-allied espionage inside NATO facilities isn’t unheard of but tends to create serious diplomatic headaches when it surfaces. With 32 members now, the trust calculus inside the alliance gets more complicated every time something like this leaks. The bigger question is which intelligence service was on the receiving end, because that detail will shape how badly this damages Canada’s standing inside the alliance going forward. Cases like this also tend to tighten intern access rules across the whole HQ, which affects future cooperation more than people realize.

    2. > The authorities in Belgium did not name the country that the intern, a woman “of Chinese origin,” is suspected of spying for.

      I wonder which country it could be

    Leave A Reply