Share.

    32 Kommentare

    1. Wtf, the DSA sure has some dumb ideas.  You can’t just abolish the Senate.  Get rid of the filibuster, or do a talking filibuster, which would lead to more picking and choosing which laws are important enough to a Minority to filibuster and would lead to younger Senators.  

    2. FlukeHawkins on

      A reminder that national and the chapters that get people elected are not the same people.

    3. „Yes, I would like south dakota that has 400k people make decisions for states that have 80 million people“

    4. Outrageous-Bite-8922 on

      A lot of ya’ll actively falling for right wing propaganda. Also the senate is an incredibly lop-sided institution compared to the House of Representatives. Why should Wyoming have the same amount of input as California on the future of the US when they have far less people? In what world is that representative democracy?

    5. HeretoFore200 on

      I think this is one of those things where anyone with ANY comparative political understanding would understand the point (the senate is not proportional representation which is to many undemocratic — which is similar rationale to why many other parliamentary systems are unicameral and similar logic to why the UK is progressively gutting the House of Lords).

      Unfortunately, we believe we’re the center of the universe and provide basically zero formal education on how any other democracies work. So this is “radical” lol.

    6. ProteinPrince on

      It would be extremely politically difficult to abolish the Senate, but it is something we should seriously consider.

      California has a population that is roughly equal to Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Idaho, Montana, West Virginia, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Arkansas, Mississippi, Iowa, Kansas, Utah, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Louisiana COMBINED.

      There is no good reason why 39 million Californians get 2 Senators, while the 39 million people in those states get 34 Senators.

      IMO we should get rid of the Senate and massively expand the House. The average congressional district has about 750k people – the founders intended districts to be no bigger than 30k people. You can argue exactly how big a district ought to be, but there’s absolutely no reason why we shouldn’t have a legislative body that gives equal representation to everyone.

    7. opanaooonana on

      Unfortunately abolishing the senate is the hardest thing to do in the US. You could repeal the bill of rights easier. It specifically says in the constitution that a state can not be deprived of its representation in the senate without its consent meaning you need unanimous consent to do it, something that will never happen.

    8. It’s not crazy to want to abolish a branch of government that thinks a state with 500k residents should have the same number of legislators as stated with 30+ million.

      That’s absurd.

    9. Reform the Senate. Abolish corporate funding of political parties and candidates.

    10. Worried_Monitor5422 on

      Lol I’d settle for increasing the size of the House, which is a simple statute. 

    11. FuzzyGolf291773 on

      Lmao at all of these people totally misunderstanding the purpose of the Senate. The Senate is a perfectly sensible political institution. I don’t get why Reddit has such a hate boner for it considering it is ultimately a moderating force to ensure smaller states aren’t discriminated against legislatively. Does it always work ideally? No, but point to any legislative body that is foolproof and works in the best interest of the people 100% of the time. Consider that the EU also has a Senate-like legislator and you’ll see rather quickly that it is neither outdated nor nonsensical in a modern form of governance.

    12. Wise_Control_1640 on

      While I’m all for it, I know that’s not the place to plant your flag right now and the mainstream media will have a field day with this.

      In every single debate, it will be the main focus. „Wait, you want to abolish the Senate?!“

    13. VengefulWalnut on

      Now, I am all for increasing representation and a quota system around a bunch of well established parties. But we need to keep both houses for the sake of checks and balances. I know the removal of the senate works on paper for their idea. But it removes a check on the system as a whole. As for ICE. Sure we need some sort of enforcement of existing laws, but the way we’re going about it now is all wrong.

    14. FangornLeghorn on

      This is so frustrating. Every time we get a little momentum build towards fixing shit, it gets taken too far with bullshit like this. Abolishing the Senate is crazy person talk and proposing it just poison pills the whole effort. They did this with police reform as well. We got some momentum toward making some actual changes, and then fuckheads turned it into “defund the police” like any society could or would ever do without any law enforcement.

      It’s fucking exhausting.

    15. Independent_Eagle691 on

      There is a FAR better option than amending the Constitution to abolish the Senate: UNCAP THE HOUSE.

      It has been the SAME size since 1911, and should have grown in 1921. However, after the 1920 Census, America became a majority urban country. That made rural interests freak out, sabotage apportionment, and Congress has been breaking ever since.

      We can simply adjust the number of members via legislation – no constitutional amendment required. We can ALSO change how electoral votes are awarded.

    16. Teepeaparty on

      Someone educate me on why abolishing the Senate…is part of the platform? Why? 

    17. CrocodylusRex on

      > Establish paid family leave for all workers

      > 32 hour work week with full pay and benefits

      > a living minimum wage

      > Provide free, quality public education from pre-K to college and cancel all student debt

      > Guarantee universal healthcare at no cost to individuals

      > Build new, publicly-owned social housing

      > establish universal rent control

      Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and nnnnnnnn I’ll have to look into it.
      > Honor all treaties and tribal sovereignty

      Only fair. Don’t believe all non-natives should pack up and leave but natives have been given the short end of the stick throughout history.
      > Enact reparations 

      Depends on the specifics.
      > Demilitarize police departments, disempower police unions, and redirect funding to public services

      Yes.
      > fully abolishing the police and prison system

      Fully? That’s an endgame goal if I’ve ever seen one.
      > Treat drug addiction and mental illness as health issues

      > Stop gender violence and end policies that oppress bodily autonomy and intimate life

      > Pass a federal jobs guarantee

      > Implement massive investment in sustainable, publicly owned energy and transit infrastructure

      Yes, yes, yes, yes.
      > Defund the Department of War

      See do you mean defund like abolish or cut? Cause we can slough off, hell I’d say 50% of the budget without fear of anyone trying to pull anything on us. 100%… I know we have a rifle behind every blade of grass but…
      > End immunity for U.S. war criminals and support the International Criminal Court’s mandate to prosecute war crimes

      Yes, it is BS that we don’t include ourselves in the global court system we send our own enemies to. Protecting America’s own interests =/= justice.
      > Recognize the rights of the Palestinian people, including the right of return, the right to resist military occupation, and the right to self determination in a free Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital

      Free Palestine and all but I don’t think „from the river to the sea“ is happening.
      > End economic warfare against countries whose governments act independently of the United States

      > End ICE detention and deportations and punish federal agents‘ brutality.

      > Legalize migration, grant amnesty for all immigrants regardless of status, provide a path to citizenship for all permanent residents, and end visa caps and quotas.

      Yes, yes, and yes. Hell, Reagan passed an amnesty law. Why should only people who happened to be born in America be allowed in?

      All in all I agree ~75% with this platform and wish there were a party seriously calling for this stuff, even if some of it is pie in the sky. Better than candidates running on things „never, ever“ passing. (I believe there’s a word for people like that. Conservatives.)

    18. Polar_Vortx on

      Just when you thought they were gonna start getting serious, they pull this shit.

    19. Like it or not the Senate has historically been a stablizing force in US politics.

    20. The Senate allows minority rule there is zero reason north dekota should get the same sway as califonia

      Nd has a population of about 800k cali has about 40 million

    21. Jesus Christ… No one wants to win any elections, apparently.

      Do you think we might start a little smaller? Like Universal Healthcare?

    22. asmallerflame on

      One of those things is a good idea. The other would require a constitutional amendment.

    23. Expecting to get rid of the Senate is about as realistic as expecting to get rid of the Electoral College. The supermajority of states needed to ratify a constitutional amendment makes it a crack pipe dream which undermines DSA’s credibility as a serious player.

    24. motorboat_mcgee on

      I’m generally supportive of DSA, but abolishing the Senate is stupid. Uncap the House, go from there.

      ICE, however, yeah, they can fuck off.

    Leave A Reply