Close Menu
    Daten

    [OC] Verfolgte die Flugbahnen von Ørjan Nylands WM-Kickouts, einschließlich des umstrittenen Norwegen-England-Kickouts

    Share.
    View 17 Comments

    17 Kommentare

    1. Empty_Photograph2578 on

      I made this visualization. Data source: FIFA EPTS 50 Hz broadcast ball-tracking data, together with broadcast footage and stadium reference geometry used for the reconstruction. Tools: Python for parsing, trajectory fitting and physics modelling; Vite, React and TypeScript for the interface; and Three.js for the interactive 3D scenes. The public data, methodology and scripts are available here: https://github.com/mhaughom/wiregate26-research-data

      I am treating possible cable contact as a testable hypothesis, not proof. The goal of publishing the data and code is to let others check the reconstruction, assumptions and alternative explanations.

    2. Schrodinger11 on

      Am I the only one who doesn’t give a shit about this? The ball dropped around the halfway line and wasn’t an immediate goal scoring opportunity.

      Shit happens, not everything has to be so dramatic

    3. jjxanadu on

      I’m on mobile. Your Speed and Height box completely obscures the graph, so I can’t see a thing…

    4. Agreeable-Corner-698 on

      Why didn’t fifa use their incredible impact sensor technology for this?!?! /s

    5. tomtomtomo on

      Wouldn’t a 122kmh kick be a far higher speed than any recorded ball speed that is shown for penalty takers? 

      Maybe I’m remembering those stats wrong though. 

    6. SasquatchStrike on

      Long balls aren’t high completion passes. Even without the wire existing, the play could have been near identical. What percentage of Nylands kick-outs were retained by Norway vs what percentage were controlled by England vs what percentage did Haaland jut tackle an England player without getting called for a foul. Those are the stats that matter

    8. johnniewelker on

      Okay why don’t we have the camera attached to wire footage itself? I’m assuming these cameras are recording all the time. So if the wire shakes, wouldn’t the camera itself show something??

    9. liamthelad on

      Couldn’t the anomaly simply be wind? How does that factor into the model?

      And wouldn’t it be better to have the control be all of Nyland’s kicks throughout the tournament, then also Pickford’s kicks as a comparison for consistency.

      Also, how does collision with a cable only cause a 4 km decrease in speed? The ball seemingly still has upwards motion after the point of collision?

    10. urban_thirst on

      Do you know why there appears to be an anomaly in one of the Brazil Norway kicks?

    11. Narwhalhats on

      Is this the only kick that shows such a significant increase in vertical speed before reaching the top of its flight? The chart shows a pretty significant increase in rate of climb well before the wire is supposed to have been hit so already looks like a big outlier even before that.

    12. smegmarash on

      It’s also an outlier in that the trajectory of the ball kept rising before it’s apex height, much like a golf ball hit by a professional. This is due to backspin which, much like a golf shot, cause the ball to fall much softer and more vertically. 

    13. sausagedog195 on

      So this graph shows it’s the only kick with the same height and speed as the long kicks, that ended up short. If that’s not a sign it hit something..

    14. realkarl on

      Awesome data! At least I am happy that England soon found out how they fared against a better team without FIFA Assisted VAR on their side.

    16. ShoddyPark on

      Did you do any null hypotheses testing? Have you compared to other goal kicks?

    Leave A Reply