Rauch von Waldbränden im Nordwesten Ontarios ist in Teile der Provinz vorgedrungen und hat zu sehr schlechter Luftqualität und eingeschränkter Sicht geführt, was Environment Canada am Mittwoch dazu veranlasste, eine Warnung vor hoher Luftqualität auszusprechen.

    Von alejandromalofiej

    Share.

    49 Kommentare

    1. Funicularly on

      “More than 100”

      Why put it that way when there are hundreds. Technically it’s true, but so is “more than 10”.

    2. The thing I find most interesting about this is the way the fires shown follow the typical movement of the jet stream over Canada. Wish I knew a way to overlay the two – that would be a very cool map to see!

    3. Mr_Bluebird_VA on

      Never mind. Can’t deal with the shear volume of people with their heads in the sand.

    4. Substantial-End-7698 on

      That map closely corresponds to a map of the boreal forest, one of the largest ecosystems on the planet.

      It feels like the entire boreal forest is on fire right now.

      I work as an airline pilot out of Toronto and was flying through the smoke yesterday. It felt like we were flying on Mars.

    5. Mysterious-Park9142 on

      Is this a newish issue, and if so what’s causing it? Seems like every summer here in Chicago we get awful smoke days at a time and it’s been going on for the past few years but I don’t remember this being a routine issue before like 2019 or so. 

    6. DrummerDerek83 on

      It’s been fine here in central sk so far this summer!

      Last year was the worst….

    7. Pure_Bicycle2355 on

      You know that means … MORE pipelines, more return to office, more urban sprawl while politicians come up with « creative ideas » to minimize climate change 🙄. Are we tired yet?!?!!?

    8. _Alvalanche on

      We need a national wildfire strategy up here. If we can spend $100B on killing machines, we can certainly invest in protecting our forests. Unless Carney thinks the market can put out fires, too?

    9. Moosetappropriate on

      The effects of climate change. Yankees whine and bitch yet continue to oppose fixing it. Maybe this will smoke them out.

    10. NOIS_KillerWhaleTank on

      „more than 100“ gives the same energy as „there’s at least one“

    11. Remember when Canada was on fire every summer when you were growing up?

      No? Me neither! Gee, I wonder what’s changed? 🤔 

    12. anelectricmind on

      Yeah. Michigan called and wants us to do something about the smoke cross the borders. They’ve been constantly whining about it for the past two summers…

      Maybe you guys should put a tarriff on it. That should do it.

    13. I don’t want to downplay any of this but I’m legit wondering about the out of control fire just to.the west of ottawa, as that area is like 80% farm land.

    14. SeeLeavesOnTheTrees on

      This happens in California but it’s super dry there. Isn’t Canada quite wet? All the snow in winter keeps the ground wet. All the rain in warmer months…

      I’m from CA and living in Michigan where I rarely water anything. So I’m so surprised that Canada burns like CA does.

      What gives?

    15. It’s wild how few are in BC and Alberta, and how many in the northern territories.

    16. Quiet_Ad1859 on

      Meanwhile, back in America, yesterday, there was 158 NEW fires reported nationwide. That’s not counting the fires that are already burning. There’s even fires in Minnesota. Ffs ! 🤦‍♂️

    17. MinuteReputation8806 on

      OK this probably a really stupid, question but how is one of the coldest countries in the world always constantly on fire.

    18. They probably reversed all the EUtopian carbon reduction self-suffering in one afternoon. LOL.

    19. International_Ad4857 on

      Did the peat start burning yet? That’s the thing that worries me. When it dries out and burns for months under the surface. Peat is a bigger carbon sink than the rainforest.

    20. Maps that instantly stop at the border are always bizarre. Open up google, activate the wildfire layer, and there’s wildfires right across the US border in Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, California, Colorado, Nevada, Virginia, Arizona, New Mexico.

    21. The areas that aren’t currently burning have had so much rain recently that our basements/underpasses/river valleys have flooded. More water than I’ve seen in 20+ years. It’s one extreme or the other lately

    22. Okay-Crickets545 on

      Some people have been pointing out we’ve had higher fire numbers in previous decades. It’s worth noting that the amount of manpower and resources we put towards preventing and putting out fires is astronomically higher than decades ago. We don’t just let these things burn and throw our hands up. So yes fires can be worse now even if there are fewer fires. We just invest ungodly amounts of resources to try and keep it under control.

    Leave A Reply