Still don’t lose the plot. Max Planck matters. Springer Nature still does not matter.
roby_stiles on
**An ‚un-retraction‘ has to be one of the rarest anomalies in modern scientific publishing. The administrative and reputational hurdles required to reverse a retraction are immense, it means someone backend made a genuinely catastrophic bureaucratic mistake**
Jealous-Leek-5428 on
a scientific publisher citing „human error“ for accidentally retracting papers is peak irony. the one job you have is getting the record right
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
3 Kommentare
Still don’t lose the plot. Max Planck matters. Springer Nature still does not matter.
**An ‚un-retraction‘ has to be one of the rarest anomalies in modern scientific publishing. The administrative and reputational hurdles required to reverse a retraction are immense, it means someone backend made a genuinely catastrophic bureaucratic mistake**
a scientific publisher citing „human error“ for accidentally retracting papers is peak irony. the one job you have is getting the record right