Eh… I mean… however strongly someone feels about this, is it really a meaningful way for the central government of a G7 nation to spend its afternoon?
MoHeeKhan on
I mean yes, that is how the process works. Rather than screaming at Pakistan and the clouds about how bullshit it is (Andy), if it’s a bad law, change the law. 🤷♂️ Well done us for actually doing something for a change?
Jeffuk88 on
Wait, so they CAN just change the last to do what everyone has been saying we should do for decades? Like, deport criminals…
bukkakekeke on
I’m sure this will still be „too little too late“ for the people screaming for exactly this to happen
JB_UK on
> As first reported by the Telegraph, Shabana Mahmood is expected to set out on Monday how she plans to amend the 1971 Immigration Act which currently stops Shabir Ahmed being removed from the UK.
Good work from Shabana Mahmood! And for the Labour leadership supporting her.
It’s a pity that she’s so disliked by Labour members, she would make a good future for the Labour party.
She would be the first female and the first non white Labour leader, and she holds social attitudes which are genuinely representative of the traditional working class, of Labour voters and the electorate more widely. That looks like it will be the moderate path not taken.
gopercolate on
Oh look Labour yet again doing what Conservatives wouldn’t 👏
MoleWhackSupreme on
“It is not known how long it would take to change the law but one government source suggested it could potentially be up to a year.”
Lmao
TheLightStalker on
Jailed for 22 years in 2012 and released in 2026. Get him back in fucking jail till at least 2032 and have him immediately removed on release then. DUH 🙄
BritishHobo on
Excited for the government to get no credit whatsoever for this
TheL0wKing on
This is not the ECHR or any of the other laws that Immigrants generally use to appeal deportations. This is not going to impact Asylum seekers or illegal immigrants or any of the current issues regarding immigration. They are talking about changing a specific section of the 1971 Immigration act that protects commonwealth citizens who were residents at least 5 years before the act came into force (1973).
Its performative.
It will take up to a year (according to the article) to pass the law, assuming no issues or redrafts required. Then there will inevitably be challenges and appeals in court. Then however long it will take for the actual deporting process. It could easily take years. All to deport the exactly one person impacted by the exemption who is already 73.
aleopardstail on
knee jerk legal changes tend to have unforeseen consequences
PositiveLibrary7032 on
And backdate it so the ones that have committed a crime go.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
12 Kommentare
Eh… I mean… however strongly someone feels about this, is it really a meaningful way for the central government of a G7 nation to spend its afternoon?
I mean yes, that is how the process works. Rather than screaming at Pakistan and the clouds about how bullshit it is (Andy), if it’s a bad law, change the law. 🤷♂️ Well done us for actually doing something for a change?
Wait, so they CAN just change the last to do what everyone has been saying we should do for decades? Like, deport criminals…
I’m sure this will still be „too little too late“ for the people screaming for exactly this to happen
> As first reported by the Telegraph, Shabana Mahmood is expected to set out on Monday how she plans to amend the 1971 Immigration Act which currently stops Shabir Ahmed being removed from the UK.
Good work from Shabana Mahmood! And for the Labour leadership supporting her.
It’s a pity that she’s so disliked by Labour members, she would make a good future for the Labour party.
https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/54797-what-do-labour-members-think-of-the-party-leadership-may-2026
She would be the first female and the first non white Labour leader, and she holds social attitudes which are genuinely representative of the traditional working class, of Labour voters and the electorate more widely. That looks like it will be the moderate path not taken.
Oh look Labour yet again doing what Conservatives wouldn’t 👏
“It is not known how long it would take to change the law but one government source suggested it could potentially be up to a year.”
Lmao
Jailed for 22 years in 2012 and released in 2026. Get him back in fucking jail till at least 2032 and have him immediately removed on release then. DUH 🙄
Excited for the government to get no credit whatsoever for this
This is not the ECHR or any of the other laws that Immigrants generally use to appeal deportations. This is not going to impact Asylum seekers or illegal immigrants or any of the current issues regarding immigration. They are talking about changing a specific section of the 1971 Immigration act that protects commonwealth citizens who were residents at least 5 years before the act came into force (1973).
Its performative.
It will take up to a year (according to the article) to pass the law, assuming no issues or redrafts required. Then there will inevitably be challenges and appeals in court. Then however long it will take for the actual deporting process. It could easily take years. All to deport the exactly one person impacted by the exemption who is already 73.
knee jerk legal changes tend to have unforeseen consequences
And backdate it so the ones that have committed a crime go.