>faciliter la collecte de preuves en cas d’accident et protéger les conducteurs contre les fraudes et les litiges.
La preuve et sa recevabilité en droit pénal luxembourgeois ne sont-elles pas libres et laissées à l’appréciation du magistrat du siège ?
En matière de nécessité législative, combien de justiciables ont eu à répondre d’une exploitation non-autorisée d’un système de vidéo-protection ?
Est-on sûr qu’il y ait un réel problème à régler par voie parlementaire ?
JeunesseEsch on
Done
shalvad on
signed, but in my opinion, it is hopeless. There were several petitions about dash cams before, without any results. Xavier Bettel clearly stated that they would never allow it in Luxembourg. So the only way to change it is to find parties who for it and to vote for them next time. For sure, that’s not the current coalition.
I believe we should not limit ourselves to dash-cameras, but rather promote the legalization of video recording in a broader sense: allowing people to install video cameras on their own homes to monitor the road or street adjacent to their property, and allowing them to record suspicious behavior or crimes with their mobile phones for submission to the police.
Current laws distort the original purpose of personal data protection and, in practice, primarily benefit criminals and troublemakers by depriving ordinary people of effective means to protect themselves.
BMK_LU on
Signed.
Shalandaar01 on
Using dashcams for years and helped me win a claim at insurance level (the other party insurance didn’t even start to argue against the use of the video for the purpose of the claim), receivability in front of a court is debatable but even so that certainly gives peace of mind
Same_Appointment2814 on
for me, this is hilarious. The deep-seated prejudice Europeans have against cameras, yet they now advocate for dashcams, revealing a clear double standard.
Saphyr-Seraph on
The problem with dashcams they would need to be certified to be tamper proof and need to have some security to not Film people in public or private eventspartys or somewhere where your car is maybe parked in the corner pointed at someone’s window or living room. It would be a legal nightmare just to make them tamper proof so only the policelawyercourt can unlook them to watch the content and even then privacy of the involved person’s is not guaranteed
BoFap on
Suppose if you had fixed inbuilt dash cams withbstorage being accessible by police only, it would solve some data protection issues.
Assuming dash cam survived the crash xD
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
>faciliter la collecte de preuves en cas d’accident et protéger les conducteurs contre les fraudes et les litiges.
La preuve et sa recevabilité en droit pénal luxembourgeois ne sont-elles pas libres et laissées à l’appréciation du magistrat du siège ?
En matière de nécessité législative, combien de justiciables ont eu à répondre d’une exploitation non-autorisée d’un système de vidéo-protection ?
Est-on sûr qu’il y ait un réel problème à régler par voie parlementaire ?
Done
signed, but in my opinion, it is hopeless. There were several petitions about dash cams before, without any results. Xavier Bettel clearly stated that they would never allow it in Luxembourg. So the only way to change it is to find parties who for it and to vote for them next time. For sure, that’s not the current coalition.
I believe we should not limit ourselves to dash-cameras, but rather promote the legalization of video recording in a broader sense: allowing people to install video cameras on their own homes to monitor the road or street adjacent to their property, and allowing them to record suspicious behavior or crimes with their mobile phones for submission to the police.
Current laws distort the original purpose of personal data protection and, in practice, primarily benefit criminals and troublemakers by depriving ordinary people of effective means to protect themselves.
Signed.
Using dashcams for years and helped me win a claim at insurance level (the other party insurance didn’t even start to argue against the use of the video for the purpose of the claim), receivability in front of a court is debatable but even so that certainly gives peace of mind
for me, this is hilarious. The deep-seated prejudice Europeans have against cameras, yet they now advocate for dashcams, revealing a clear double standard.
The problem with dashcams they would need to be certified to be tamper proof and need to have some security to not Film people in public or private eventspartys or somewhere where your car is maybe parked in the corner pointed at someone’s window or living room. It would be a legal nightmare just to make them tamper proof so only the policelawyercourt can unlook them to watch the content and even then privacy of the involved person’s is not guaranteed
Suppose if you had fixed inbuilt dash cams withbstorage being accessible by police only, it would solve some data protection issues.
Assuming dash cam survived the crash xD