Die Datenbrillen von Meta weisen noch größere Datenschutzprobleme auf, als wir dachten

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gear/a70782916/meta-smart-glasses-privacy-report-spring-2026/?utm_source=social&utm_medium=copy&utm_campaign=action_bar

    Share.

    15 Kommentare

    1. TheDudeAbidesFarOut on

      Wouldn’t expect anything less from thee biggest privacy creep in existence…..

    2. Can you even call it an „issue“ when it does exactly what it is built for? Like, „AR-15’s are even worse for your health then we thought“ oh yeah okay

    3. newtoallofthis2 on

      How incredibly on brand.

      Imagine having as much money and power as Meta does and still acting like they do to wring out every single last cent no matter the moral or societal cost.

    4. Affectionate_Hornet7 on

      I keep saying that thing isn’t just recording when you tell it to. That’s the next thing we’re going to learn.

    5. Medical_Tailor4644 on

      Smart glasses raise the same old privacy trade-off, just in a more invisible form always-on cameras + AI processing makes consent and awareness way harder in public spaces.

    6. Expert-Swordfish7611 on

      It’s crazy how the average person doesn’t realize AI and machine learning only exist with low paid workers monitoring cameras around the clock and drawing squares around everything you interact with so they can monetize and disrupt more of what we find familiar and affordable. Remember when you jerked off behind that girl at the AI vending machine? Me and the C-level staff, and the whole machine learning team in the Philippines, we’re watching and sharing that clip internally. Then no action was taken. No policies implemented. Venture Capital is the only thing that matters.

    7. Ok_Blackberry7260 on

      Honestly wearable AI becomes a very different privacy problem once cameras, microphones, real-time identification, memory, and contextual awareness are embedded into everyday social interaction.

      The uncomfortable part is that social norms usually adapt slower than the technology itself. By the time people fully process what constant ambient recording means, the devices may already be normalized in public life.

    8. wernerverklempt on

      It couldn’t be worse than I thought and I don’t even know any details whatsoever.

    9. Capt_Blahvious on

      Question: are these smart glasses always sending data to Meta even when the user is not recording? Can the user control when it is sending video to Meta?

    10. that1cooldude on

      Fuck Meta. They should be paying me to wear their shit and even then, I still wouldn’t do it. Fuck Meta. They are anti-human.

    11. LeopardComfortable99 on

      Frankly, if you’re dumb enough to buy these, then you get what you deserve. Facebook have always been shady over data, why would these be any different?

    12. Disastrous-Soup-5413 on

      No, we all knew it would have huge privacy issues, massive privacy issues.

      The only people that said it wouldn’t have privacy issues were the people trying to sell it or the people benefiting from its sale.

    13. I mean… I get it. Until AI gets WAY better, humans gotta make products better. It’s going to take human review and human adjustment.

      But, companies need to be crystal clear, as in front page notifications in a decent font and human readable phrasing, they your footage -will- be looked at by a human.

      Give people the ability to make an informed choice.

    Leave A Reply