Das Pentagon verschärft den Vorwurf Kanadas mit der Forderung nach einem NATO-Ausgabenplan und einer F-35-Entscheidung
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/us-canada-defence-board-spending-politics-9.7207835
Das Pentagon verschärft den Vorwurf Kanadas mit der Forderung nach einem NATO-Ausgabenplan und einer F-35-Entscheidung
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/us-canada-defence-board-spending-politics-9.7207835
8 Kommentare
Ah yes, more hot air will surely improve F-35 sales numbers.
The jets are a trade irritant. A *bridge* is a trade irritant. What’s next – campaigning against Danielle Smith’s separation referendum is somehow a trade irritant?
The Trump administration[ is now alleged to be linked](https://www.yacnews.com/us-political-operatives-built-a-surveillance-app-for-alberta-separatists-a-coordinated-attack-to-destabilise-canada/) to one of the largest data breaches in Canadian history, itself an outcome of their foreign interference in our political process. They’ve previously and recently [threatened to violate our airspace and effectively take it over i](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-canada-airspace-fighter-jets-b2907807.html)f we do not buy their F35s.
And they don’t *need* a „kill switch“ if they’re the *sole source of parts*.
>“The Canadian government’s delays and lack of transparency around its ongoing F-35 review are just one example of the prioritization of politics over our shared responsibility for North America’s defence,“ said the U.S. official. „The [U.S.] welcomes a rapid conclusion to this review.“
The conclusion ought to be that it’s not for us. We should buy a handful of Gripens from Sweden and an obnoxiously large number of drones from Ukraine, instead.
Canada picking a fighter jet challenge:
Actually impossible
The RCAF and anyone in the know already concluded a long time ago this is the best option for us. The gripen is an inferior 4th generation aircraft that is not an equal to the F35 and still leaves us reliant on other nations for parts and expertise. The Gripen uses an American engine too, so either way you’re still reliant on the US.
If Canada wants true independence it would need to develop its own program and build everything here, otherwise no matter what you’re dependent on other nations.
EDIT: And for the downvotes feel free to provide a rebuttal, or is my answer invalid because it doesn’t senselessly bash the US?
So basically they want to have a meeting and get briefed on things about our military plans etc…..that sounds like something one would do at a binational defence planning board meeting…….🤷♂️
“The Pentagon wants to see Canada articulate a clear plan on how the country intends to meet NATO’s new military spending benchmark before resuming binational defence planning co-operation.
“
Dear Americans.
We will buy your F-35 when you dethrone your Despot-in-Chief from his functions, at which point we will re-evaluate if your products are still worth it considering your current inability to even manufacture them in due time and at the promised cost.
Until then, we will continue to look elsewhere for other more reliable partners, especially those who respect us.
Tata!
Canada probably should spend more on their military. Otherwise the US and Russia might decide to divide it between them.
Sure our spending road map is mass money in nukes now as fast as we can and either the gripen or the eurofighter. Fuck buying the F35 with its calling home before it will even work.
No more F-35s. Take what we already wasted money on and not a penny more. And fuck this 5% BS. Way too much. That is a ton of money and huge increase from what it is now. We have more important things to spend on.