>The national poll conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights found that 82 per cent of Canadians believed Canada should “defend itself without relying too heavily on other countries.” The same number supported the Canadian government’s Defence Industrial Strategy to accomplish that goal.
>
>Prime Minister Mark Carney announced his government’s defence industrial strategy on Feb. 17, 2026, promising to pump billions of dollars into small- and medium-sized Canadian businesses. Carney has also vowed to make sure Canadian firms get the lion’s share of defence contracts let by the federal government. The prime minister complained that currently up to 75 per cent of Canada’s defence capital had been used to purchase U.S.-built equipment.
>
>“What we’re seeing is that defence procurement is a Canadian sovereignty issue,” Paul Ziadé of ACDC said in a statement with the release of the poll. “Whether you’re in Atlantic Canada or Alberta, whether you’re 25 or 65, Canadians are saying the same thing everywhere. We need to build defence equipment here to ensure Canada is not dependent on foreign suppliers and that taxpayer dollars support skilled jobs and manufacturing across the country.”
PuzzleheadedOven2165 on
And then they turn around and wonder why procurement is so politicized and costs three times what it should. You want to buy only Canadian and only support jobs in vulnerable ridings so incumbent MPs can keep their seats?
Be prepares to pay three, five, or ten times as much to build a shittier version in canada of something we could just buy off the shelf from someone that already has a factory and a design.
SkinnedIt on
I do too, but we can’t supply ourselves completely. We’ve pissed a lot of domestic capacity away since WW2 as far as self-sufficiency goes – in almost every sector, not just defence.
nekonight on
We have no tanks, no planes, no artillery production in canada.
Altruistic_Report827 on
Not just for the defense industries, any industry should focus on Canadian made products/Canadian companies.
sleipnir45 on
Canadian companies can’t survive from one military order once every 50 years
TubeframeMR2 on
I think a better approach is to join like minded countries and divide up the pie. Each becomes specialized in one or more domains creating efficiencies and scale. Then trade among the parties. Same level of industrial development but at a lower cost.
crazysparky4 on
It’s kind of been shown in the last few years that once you are in a conflict and have expended your munitions stockpiles, you’re very exposed to the political whims of foreign suppliers. It may costs us more but without local production capacity, there’s no guarantee of resupply.
Disastrous_Junket455 on
As long as there’s no replication of a purchase of a product like the LSVW fiasco.
PostMatureBaby on
Kraken and Volatus please 😉
Belzebutt on
The real goal of the US demands to spend 5% is to send them more of our money and get more dependent on their military equipment. None of which is in our interest. The biggest threat to our country right now is from the south. They don’t care about us defending against Russia, Trump loves Putin and would never offend Russia enough to risk a conflict. We need to show a credible defence of our territory, but do so using sovereign means and supplied by countries who don’t threaten us. Supplying from countries who threaten us is self defeating, you’re just asking for a supply chain disruption. If our gear costs more but is produced domestically, or at least from friendly countries who also buy from us, that’s aligned with our interests. Don’t kid yourself, the US military procurement is for corporate interests, not for defence. And we will never please this administration, they are pillaging their own country and they will pillage us if we let them.
sch0k0 on
I don’t think we need to develop everything alone, but look at the level of tech Sweden with a quarter of the population can put in the air.
Joining European consortiums that could enable a high degree of Canadian value creation never looked more necessary.
And a high capacity to build our own ammunitions and drones seems to be a lesson to take from the Ukraine war.
Channing1986 on
No way!
Consistent_Ad3181 on
Favourable partnership with Euro firms, with some quid pro quo
Zarxon on
Honestly we should be setting up crown corps for defense manufacturing. Keep the jobs here, keep the gouging out, and sell to other countries for profit
China_bot42069 on
Did the guns bans all kind of out an end to that. A lot of Canadian based companies folded and went under with all the bans.
firefly_12 on
A nice sentiment but not entirely realistic sadly. We have fallen behind significantly in terms of military production capability and would need to spend several years re-developing these capabilities. So we don’t have a lot of choice in the mean time but to look to foreign companies for weapons, and US companies are very good at it. So for the moment, I think we should just go with whichever is best in terms of capabilities with a mix of US, European and Korean/Japanese hardware while developing domestic industries as much as possible.
matwick70 on
Now!
dontsheeple on
The Libs destroyed Canada’s manufacturing sector and now Canadians want Canadian built defence products, that’s not what you voted for.
uprightshark on
100% Canadian
If we don’t make it … START!
Creepy-Team6442 on
It’s not just Canadians that want this. I’m an American and would prefer Canada would do this whenever possible. Thank you for any support in boycotting any and all American made products. 🇨🇦🍁
I_argue_for_funsies on
If companies are forced to do their due diligence to find Canadian labour before applying for foreign workers, wouldn’t it make sense for govt money as well?
Maybe use some of that money to audit your contract recipients tho. Cuz you guys are terrible at validation
mechant_papa on
We need to reinstate Canadian government arsenals. That’s the simple answer.
Saisinko on
You ever heard that if you give a food bank $10 they can buy $20 worth of food with it?
Well, government spending feels like taking $10 and turning into $3. Businesses salivate at the thought of government contracts.
Focus on a few core competencies and don’t try to force industries in Canada to exist which can’t self-sustain without excessive government handouts.
mortgageletdown on
If a government dollar is spent and there is a local / provincial / Canadian supplier for that good or service, that should be the default. How is that not obvious?
anacondra on
>Canadians want defence dollars spent on Canadian-owned firms, not U.S. companies or their subsidiaries
I’m actually okay with non Canadian firms as long as they’re also not US.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
26 Kommentare
>The national poll conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights found that 82 per cent of Canadians believed Canada should “defend itself without relying too heavily on other countries.” The same number supported the Canadian government’s Defence Industrial Strategy to accomplish that goal.
>
>Prime Minister Mark Carney announced his government’s defence industrial strategy on Feb. 17, 2026, promising to pump billions of dollars into small- and medium-sized Canadian businesses. Carney has also vowed to make sure Canadian firms get the lion’s share of defence contracts let by the federal government. The prime minister complained that currently up to 75 per cent of Canada’s defence capital had been used to purchase U.S.-built equipment.
>
>“What we’re seeing is that defence procurement is a Canadian sovereignty issue,” Paul Ziadé of ACDC said in a statement with the release of the poll. “Whether you’re in Atlantic Canada or Alberta, whether you’re 25 or 65, Canadians are saying the same thing everywhere. We need to build defence equipment here to ensure Canada is not dependent on foreign suppliers and that taxpayer dollars support skilled jobs and manufacturing across the country.”
And then they turn around and wonder why procurement is so politicized and costs three times what it should. You want to buy only Canadian and only support jobs in vulnerable ridings so incumbent MPs can keep their seats?
Be prepares to pay three, five, or ten times as much to build a shittier version in canada of something we could just buy off the shelf from someone that already has a factory and a design.
I do too, but we can’t supply ourselves completely. We’ve pissed a lot of domestic capacity away since WW2 as far as self-sufficiency goes – in almost every sector, not just defence.
We have no tanks, no planes, no artillery production in canada.
Not just for the defense industries, any industry should focus on Canadian made products/Canadian companies.
Canadian companies can’t survive from one military order once every 50 years
I think a better approach is to join like minded countries and divide up the pie. Each becomes specialized in one or more domains creating efficiencies and scale. Then trade among the parties. Same level of industrial development but at a lower cost.
It’s kind of been shown in the last few years that once you are in a conflict and have expended your munitions stockpiles, you’re very exposed to the political whims of foreign suppliers. It may costs us more but without local production capacity, there’s no guarantee of resupply.
As long as there’s no replication of a purchase of a product like the LSVW fiasco.
Kraken and Volatus please 😉
The real goal of the US demands to spend 5% is to send them more of our money and get more dependent on their military equipment. None of which is in our interest. The biggest threat to our country right now is from the south. They don’t care about us defending against Russia, Trump loves Putin and would never offend Russia enough to risk a conflict. We need to show a credible defence of our territory, but do so using sovereign means and supplied by countries who don’t threaten us. Supplying from countries who threaten us is self defeating, you’re just asking for a supply chain disruption. If our gear costs more but is produced domestically, or at least from friendly countries who also buy from us, that’s aligned with our interests. Don’t kid yourself, the US military procurement is for corporate interests, not for defence. And we will never please this administration, they are pillaging their own country and they will pillage us if we let them.
I don’t think we need to develop everything alone, but look at the level of tech Sweden with a quarter of the population can put in the air.
Joining European consortiums that could enable a high degree of Canadian value creation never looked more necessary.
And a high capacity to build our own ammunitions and drones seems to be a lesson to take from the Ukraine war.
No way!
Favourable partnership with Euro firms, with some quid pro quo
Honestly we should be setting up crown corps for defense manufacturing. Keep the jobs here, keep the gouging out, and sell to other countries for profit
Did the guns bans all kind of out an end to that. A lot of Canadian based companies folded and went under with all the bans.
A nice sentiment but not entirely realistic sadly. We have fallen behind significantly in terms of military production capability and would need to spend several years re-developing these capabilities. So we don’t have a lot of choice in the mean time but to look to foreign companies for weapons, and US companies are very good at it. So for the moment, I think we should just go with whichever is best in terms of capabilities with a mix of US, European and Korean/Japanese hardware while developing domestic industries as much as possible.
Now!
The Libs destroyed Canada’s manufacturing sector and now Canadians want Canadian built defence products, that’s not what you voted for.
100% Canadian
If we don’t make it … START!
It’s not just Canadians that want this. I’m an American and would prefer Canada would do this whenever possible. Thank you for any support in boycotting any and all American made products. 🇨🇦🍁
If companies are forced to do their due diligence to find Canadian labour before applying for foreign workers, wouldn’t it make sense for govt money as well?
Maybe use some of that money to audit your contract recipients tho. Cuz you guys are terrible at validation
We need to reinstate Canadian government arsenals. That’s the simple answer.
You ever heard that if you give a food bank $10 they can buy $20 worth of food with it?
Well, government spending feels like taking $10 and turning into $3. Businesses salivate at the thought of government contracts.
Focus on a few core competencies and don’t try to force industries in Canada to exist which can’t self-sustain without excessive government handouts.
If a government dollar is spent and there is a local / provincial / Canadian supplier for that good or service, that should be the default. How is that not obvious?
>Canadians want defence dollars spent on Canadian-owned firms, not U.S. companies or their subsidiaries
I’m actually okay with non Canadian firms as long as they’re also not US.