Share.

    20 Kommentare

    1. Scoobydoomed on

      *“Skin biopsies were also collected before and after grape consumption from both UV-exposed and unexposed skin.*

      *Although more than one hundred skin samples were collected, many failed RNA sequencing quality checks.*

      *Complete usable data came from only four women, all with the same skin type and all originally classified as non-responders because their redness threshold had not improved.“*

      Lol what? Their whole study is based off of samples from 4 women…

    2. „The first clue came from measurements of malondialdehyde, a marker linked with oxidative stress and cell membrane damage after UV exposure.

      Across the larger participant group, malondialdehyde levels dropped significantly after grape consumption.

      Even the four apparent non-responders showed reduced oxidative damage.“

    3. Yeah. Saw the sourceand it has conflict of interest

      Funded by California Grape Commission.

      I dont understand why this sub even allows such articles

    4. First time hearing a scientist use the term “superfood,” since there is no such thing.

    5. No, they don’t say that at all. Scientists NEVER say that. ‚Superfood‘ is not a scientific term. Journalists say shit like that.

    6. YonYonYonYonYon on

      „Superfood“ is not a real thing and you should be suspicious of anyone using that term.

    7. MisanthropicAtheist on

      Scientists definitely aren’t saying that since „superfood“ is a marketing term.

    8. Ok_Storm1366 on

      Meh, they have a ton of sugar and don’t have a great nutritional profile. They’re also washed in pesticides. I pass on grapes.

    9. I don’t get why they feel the need to pay for this kind of propoganda? Most people already like grapes, and everyone already knows they’re good for you.

    10. steveschoenberg on

      Grapes good, fermented foods good, ergo, wine great. Best news ever.

    11. „Inter- and Intraindividual Variation of Gene Expression in Human Skin Following Grape Consumption and/or Exposure to Ultraviolet Irradiation“

      Suspiciously unspecific publication title…

      then an abstract that contains zero data, then

      „This procedure was followed with all 29 volunteers and biopsies were used for histological examination and immunohistochemical work. Nucleic acid was also extracted for subsequent RNA-Seq analysis. However, all four biopsies obtained from a single individual only passed quality control measures with four of the volunteers“

      all data are based on an n=4, then

      „This work was supported in part by the California Table Grape Commission“

      „[John Pezzuto] and RBvB serve on the scientific advisory committee of the California Table Grape Commission.“

      “We are now certain that grapes act as a superfood” said Dr. John Pezzuto

      Ill be sure to never read any publication pezzuto is on again.

    12. for 25/29 people, they took 4 skin punch biopsies and then failed to handle or process those samples correctly and just threw out that data.

      Thats 100 holes they dug into humans for absolutely no reason.

    Leave A Reply