*“Skin biopsies were also collected before and after grape consumption from both UV-exposed and unexposed skin.*
*Although more than one hundred skin samples were collected, many failed RNA sequencing quality checks.*
*Complete usable data came from only four women, all with the same skin type and all originally classified as non-responders because their redness threshold had not improved.“*
Lol what? Their whole study is based off of samples from 4 women…
Cristiano1 on
„The first clue came from measurements of malondialdehyde, a marker linked with oxidative stress and cell membrane damage after UV exposure.
Across the larger participant group, malondialdehyde levels dropped significantly after grape consumption.
Even the four apparent non-responders showed reduced oxidative damage.“
Sellazard on
Yeah. Saw the sourceand it has conflict of interest
Funded by California Grape Commission.
I dont understand why this sub even allows such articles
REXIS_AGECKO on
Everything is a “superfood”
ecafsub on
First time hearing a scientist use the term “superfood,” since there is no such thing.
YourGuyK on
Superfood is a marketing term, not a scientific one. It’s meaningless.
GoodWhoops on
In mice
CarlJH on
No, they don’t say that at all. Scientists NEVER say that. ‚Superfood‘ is not a scientific term. Journalists say shit like that.
YonYonYonYonYon on
„Superfood“ is not a real thing and you should be suspicious of anyone using that term.
MisanthropicAtheist on
Scientists definitely aren’t saying that since „superfood“ is a marketing term.
naughtyamoeba on
It’s a shame that they are sprayed so heavily then.
Ok_Storm1366 on
Meh, they have a ton of sugar and don’t have a great nutritional profile. They’re also washed in pesticides. I pass on grapes.
costafilh0 on
Sponsored by Big Grape
trill_jefe on
Yeah right
Eat grapes every week
Shit skin….
Liars
Jarsky2 on
I don’t get why they feel the need to pay for this kind of propoganda? Most people already like grapes, and everyone already knows they’re good for you.
„Inter- and Intraindividual Variation of Gene Expression in Human Skin Following Grape Consumption and/or Exposure to Ultraviolet Irradiation“
Suspiciously unspecific publication title…
then an abstract that contains zero data, then
„This procedure was followed with all 29 volunteers and biopsies were used for histological examination and immunohistochemical work. Nucleic acid was also extracted for subsequent RNA-Seq analysis. However, all four biopsies obtained from a single individual only passed quality control measures with four of the volunteers“
all data are based on an n=4, then
„This work was supported in part by the California Table Grape Commission“
„[John Pezzuto] and RBvB serve on the scientific advisory committee of the California Table Grape Commission.“
“We are now certain that grapes act as a superfood” said Dr. John Pezzuto
Ill be sure to never read any publication pezzuto is on again.
SelarDorr on
for 25/29 people, they took 4 skin punch biopsies and then failed to handle or process those samples correctly and just threw out that data.
Thats 100 holes they dug into humans for absolutely no reason.
paulsteinway on
I’d be skeptical of any scientist who used the word „superfood“.
Hertje73 on
„may be“
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
20 Kommentare
*“Skin biopsies were also collected before and after grape consumption from both UV-exposed and unexposed skin.*
*Although more than one hundred skin samples were collected, many failed RNA sequencing quality checks.*
*Complete usable data came from only four women, all with the same skin type and all originally classified as non-responders because their redness threshold had not improved.“*
Lol what? Their whole study is based off of samples from 4 women…
„The first clue came from measurements of malondialdehyde, a marker linked with oxidative stress and cell membrane damage after UV exposure.
Across the larger participant group, malondialdehyde levels dropped significantly after grape consumption.
Even the four apparent non-responders showed reduced oxidative damage.“
Yeah. Saw the sourceand it has conflict of interest
Funded by California Grape Commission.
I dont understand why this sub even allows such articles
Everything is a “superfood”
First time hearing a scientist use the term “superfood,” since there is no such thing.
Superfood is a marketing term, not a scientific one. It’s meaningless.
In mice
No, they don’t say that at all. Scientists NEVER say that. ‚Superfood‘ is not a scientific term. Journalists say shit like that.
„Superfood“ is not a real thing and you should be suspicious of anyone using that term.
Scientists definitely aren’t saying that since „superfood“ is a marketing term.
It’s a shame that they are sprayed so heavily then.
Meh, they have a ton of sugar and don’t have a great nutritional profile. They’re also washed in pesticides. I pass on grapes.
Sponsored by Big Grape
Yeah right
Eat grapes every week
Shit skin….
Liars
I don’t get why they feel the need to pay for this kind of propoganda? Most people already like grapes, and everyone already knows they’re good for you.
Grapes good, fermented foods good, ergo, wine great. Best news ever.
„Inter- and Intraindividual Variation of Gene Expression in Human Skin Following Grape Consumption and/or Exposure to Ultraviolet Irradiation“
Suspiciously unspecific publication title…
then an abstract that contains zero data, then
„This procedure was followed with all 29 volunteers and biopsies were used for histological examination and immunohistochemical work. Nucleic acid was also extracted for subsequent RNA-Seq analysis. However, all four biopsies obtained from a single individual only passed quality control measures with four of the volunteers“
all data are based on an n=4, then
„This work was supported in part by the California Table Grape Commission“
„[John Pezzuto] and RBvB serve on the scientific advisory committee of the California Table Grape Commission.“
“We are now certain that grapes act as a superfood” said Dr. John Pezzuto
Ill be sure to never read any publication pezzuto is on again.
for 25/29 people, they took 4 skin punch biopsies and then failed to handle or process those samples correctly and just threw out that data.
Thats 100 holes they dug into humans for absolutely no reason.
I’d be skeptical of any scientist who used the word „superfood“.
„may be“