Eine dreiköpfige Kommission in Utah hat gerade ein 9-Gigawatt-Rechenzentrum genehmigt, über 1.000 Demonstranten riefen „Schande“. Es verbraucht mehr Strom als der gesamte Staat. Die Genehmigung dauerte 4 Monate, nicht die üblichen 5 Jahre. [OC]

    Von MarkusGrant

    Share.

    38 Kommentare

    1. TheRealPomax on

      4 months instead of 5 years pretty much writes its own case that 1000 people who can trivially show real monetary damages can bring before the courts.

    2. So, how are they going to power this center? If they don’t self-power, they should be denied.

    3. DoublePostedBroski on

      Georgia is missing Project Sail which just got approved even though the community said no.

    4. What does „State Legislation passed“ mean here?

      State legislation in favor of data centers or against them?

    5. EnjoyMikeHawk1 on

      Idk shit about local and state governments but why do these depts or commissions allow data centers to be approved if the public universally hates them. Like whats in it for them or who they represent?

    6. Shina_Tianfei on

      We can all agree 5 years is a stupid amount of time to get things approved. This is why nothing gets built.

    7. Anonymustafar on

      It’s so interesting when you view this in the wider context of history. At least since the Industrial Revolution and possibly before, large jumps in technology and standard of living are are driven by large jumps in our species’ ability to produce power. are we at another critical crossroads here?

      Will this force humanity to massively adopt nuclear?

    8. They’re trying to put a couple in Mississippi also. And if you want to see the double fuck just check out the water situations happening in Jackson, MS and other places that don’t have the infrastructure to even handle their citizens.

    9. ilovemydog480 on

      Throw that Canadian jerk “Mr wonderful” out of our country. The rich always win

    10. SnoozingBasset on

      I don’t think this is the end. Data centers use a lot of water. At least the ones I know anything about.  Utah is a fairly dry state. There are places that have two water mains. One is fit to drink. The other is to water your lawn & garden. Utah has droughts. How is this supposed to work?

    11. CatTheKitten on

      Utahn here. This data sucks and We fucking hate this. Kevin O’Leary is accusing protestors of being CCP agents, bussed in from out of state, etc.

      The commissioners fled from their own public panel due to how furious people are. In another they told their population to grow up.

      We have literally no water for what they want to do. No exaggeration. We had the worst snowfall ever this last winter and record temps early in march. The trees bloomed a month early for Gods sake.

      Its also a SIXTY TWO MILE FACILITY. 38 THOUSAND SQUARE ACRES. Thats bigger than SLC and most of its suburbs.

      Hate. Let me tell you how much I’ve come to hate.

    12. Does there being a 1,000 protestors mean it should be overruled?

      Elder Box County is relatively small at 66,000 people so ~1.5% and most of those people are from outside the county.

      Also, the data center will start off at 1.5GW and eventually scale to 9

    13. Why not build it in Idaho where they have an abundance of water and hydro electric power? Sure Utah gets snowfall but they need it for their growing population and shrinking salt lake.

      Might need to rename SLC to Salt Flat City.

    14. therendevouswithfish on

      These data centers need to be – carbon neutral, have self sufficient water supply with 100% re-use of the water or they must desalinate ocean water for it, stop using out fresh/ground water, and 0 effect on customer power supply and cost.

      Cool the devices with water, send that off to large storage to cool down while cycling new water.

    15. Is this sub a political mouthpiece now?

      I thought this was about well-organized and aesthetically pleasing data graphs

    16. Urbandale2013 on

      I think Iowa’s is backwards. The county said no but then they got a city to annex the land and ok it without any of the restrictions.

    17. petitions mean nothing. big money behind datacenters, they will be built. The water wars are comin boys, just sad I’m too old to blast the clankers.

    18. SenseEuphoric5802 on

      Bribery and corruption. That is usually how it happens.

      Follow the money with feds checking bank accounts can reveal it.

    19. PandorasBoxMaker on

      Those three people need to have their assets and finances monitored for the rest of their life, including family. Clear bribery.

    20. It takes decades of red tape to get high speed rail built in the US (CalHSR) and has far more benefits than a mega data center.

      If NYC Mayor Mamdani has proven anything it’s that the government can work for the people but we don’t provide them with the necessary ~~bribes~~ lobbying.

    21. This is not dataisbeautiful at all. If you don’t already understand this issue, this graphic won’t tell you anything. Try again

    22. If any crimes were committed by the taking of bribes for the approval of that data center, I suggest someone in that community start doing some serious digging. Because the o my way I see that happening is by large sums of money flowing into three people’s pockets.

    23. firmlygraspit99 on

      Kentucky, Cave City, city council voting on 1 year moratorium on the 18th.

    Leave A Reply