Michael McDowell: Hören Sie auf, einmalige ländliche Wohnungen zu verteufeln. Nicht jeder möchte von Nachbarn umgeben sein

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2026/05/13/michael-mcdowell-stop-demonising-one-off-rural-housing-not-everyone-wants-to-be-surrounded-by-neighbours/

    Von B8_B8_B8

    Share.

    39 Kommentare

    1. gowangowangowan on

      That is fine if someone wants to live in one off housing. However, they should pay higher LPT for the extra burden they create and should waive all rights to moan about wind farms, why there isn’t a bus outside of their door, why a GP is not five minutes walk away etc…

      A lot of people living in rural Ireland want the pros of rural living yet expect the services of living in Manhattan.

    2. Interventionist-2002 on

      Those people should stop complaining about the quality of roads in rural areas, and the level of traffic if they are traveling to any of the cities then.

      Those are the consequences that come with one-off housing.

    3. Even a straw man would be embarrassed to make these arguments. 

      “If town and village life is so much more sensible and attractive, why do so few people choose to live above the shop in many small rural towns?”

      The opinion editor should’ve sent the whole piece back to McDowell. 

    4. CountrysFucked on

      Council rezoned my parents house Into the nearby village after 2 new estates were constructed. The village has a single pub, no other amenities of any kind, not even a shop. So now im not allowed to build a house now and they want me to go into an estate, 10 minutes from nearest shop. Why the fuck would I do that! Worst of both worlds. All it did was force me out of my local area and buy a house somewhere else.

    5. InfectedAztec on

      An uncomfortable truth for living in an estate is you have no control over who your neighbours are. Ive been on the market looking for a house and auctioneers will literally tell you „id be wary of that estate its 80% social housing but this other one is only 10%“. Then you get the stories of the CC moving in certain families that couldn’t give a shit about society or law in general and the advice you get is tough shit, put up or sell up.

      Its a legitimate criticism on the system that we expect too little of some and too much of others. Not everyone wants to roll the dice on a 35 year mortgage hoping their neighbours are good people. Weve all seen the advice requests here from people strugling with neighbours that the CC put in but wont discipline about boise, litter or worse behaviour. You can avoid that by buying a house in the country.

    6. theoldkitbag on

      I live in a ‚one-off‘ old farmhouse, built in 1890. I fully expect that the number of services, and the quality thereof sometimes, be far lesser than those provided to urban dwellers. Rubbish collection is a big issue for us, for example, but that’s just the price to be paid.

      The point I would make against McDowell here is that one-off rural housing plays almost no part in sustaining rural life or, more particularly, village life. To live in one-off housing means that you have a car, and it means that you either work from home or travel by car to some conurbation to work. You go to the gym in town, you do your shopping in town, you use the post office in town, you use the health services in town. You pretty much never interact with ‚village‘ infrastructure (if there even is any) outside of the local school and GAA club (if that).

      There is a conflation being made by McDowell, and others who want to build their house on the half-acre from Dad, between living in the countryside and ‚rural life‘. One does not mean the other. Rural life depends on active, sustainable, and socially and commercially viable villages of which there only a handful left. Ireland, in trying to support rural life by rolling out broadband to every door, killed off the main leverage she had on trying to get people to live in villages again. Coupled with this, a lot of villages that could have been developed were not because the sewage and water facilities weren’t there and the state wasn’t interested in providing them. Villages can’t grow, people no longer actively need them, and ‚rural life‘ is essentially dead. Hamlets have already disintegrated. All you get now are small clusters of houses all built by and for the same family, joined by long ribbons of McMansions built in the 80’s and 90’s.

    7. Fluffy-Answer-6722 on

      Stop putting 20% social housing into private estates , that’s the main gripe and fear of people buying privately in towns now

    8. SoloWingPixy88 on

      If they were self sufficient it would be fine but they put a strain on resources.

    9. EducationChemical488 on

      To be honest. As long as the built is reasonably sized, built properly & complies with normal building regs. We shouldnt be forcing people to not build houses in a massive housing shortage

    10. It was cheaper for me to build a house then to buy an estate house in my local town.

      And due to how much of a clusterfuck traffic is in said town it sends huge traffic out to rural areas anyway, towns are just not designed well here at all here , they throw estates up anywhere with seemingly no thought for how to deal with the traffic.

      I’d have had no problem living in a town but the cons far outweighed the benefits🤷

    11. Alpha-Bravo-C on

      The problem with one-off housing is that it makes it harder to provide services to rural areas. Why aren’t we just encouraging more people to actually just live in the village? Within walking distance of the shops, the pub, and a bus stop? That would solve so many issues around access for people who can’t drive, or isolation issues for the elderly.

      We don’t need everyone living in an apartment in the city. We just need to encourage more people (not all, just some) to live in the village instead of as far from any other living human as possible.

    12. Creative_Elephant624 on

      One-off housing isn’t practical, and your right to one-off housing is far less important than building communities that make sense.

      The government should be zoning, planning and developing plots for housing, and taking the speculation out of large scale and single-house development.

      Identify suitable locations, apportion the land into plots, and set aside space for services (shops, childcare, whatever is needed for a given area).

      We massively overstate the demand for one-off housing, and underestimate the difficulties it creates.

    13. While I understand that some people want to have a house away from everyone, they also want water, electricity, internet and access to emergency services which cost alot of money to setup for a single house.

      Thats the reason why once off housing was blocked as it was wasteful of resources and higher density housing is more cost effective for these services.

    14. One-off housing is grand, in the middle of nowhere. But if you own land in a city or town, there should be restrictions on low density builds. I would even extend that to a forecast of how that urban area is supposed to grow in the next 50 or 100 years. No point in allowing one-off builds just outside a city’s boundaries if in 20 years it’ll be consumed by the city anyway. You see it all over our urban areas, houses built in the tiger now dwarfed by apartment blocks on nearby sites. Not to mention that gives the owner a chance to object to these developments because they can argue a number of points about light, character of area, traffic, amenities, environment, among other things. The planning laws are the crux of the issue in Ireland.

    15. Fickle_Definition351 on

      We’re stuck in a dichotomy between living in a self-built „one-off“ house in the middle of nowhere, vs living in a cookie cutter „estate“ in a town or village.

      If you look at other European towns on Google maps, most of their suburbs made of self built houses on new streets at the edge of the town, and it’s not ribbon development either. The whole „estate“ Vs „one-off“ argument doesn’t exist there. I wonder why we’re so different

    16. wascallywabbit666 on

      It’s not necessarily demonising one-off housing, it’s demonising:
      – Inadequate and unmaintained septic tanks leaking sewage into groundwater and rivers
      – People drinking unsafe groundwater from boreholes
      – The government having to spend huge amounts on infrastructure, e.g. power lines
      – Emergency services (e.g. ambulances) having to drive long distances along poor quality roads
      – Carers having to drive long distances to visit the homes of elderly / disabled people
      – Excess traffic from car dependent people
      – Social isolation, particularly for kids have to be driven everywhere

    17. Confident_Reporter14 on

      I’d be all for this provided one-off housing accepts to foot the higher costs for services like water, electricity, roads etc.

      If you want this, then it’s really not up to urban folk to subsidise it for you.

    18. I will build my one off house in the middle of nowhere, fully off grid, well and own food.
      That’s true wealth.

    19. TheBacklogReviews on

      I’m freshly shocked every day at how many people are just like selfish children. “I don’t want to live near people,” “I don’t want solar panels and wind turbines because I don’t like how they look,” “I don’t want people to migrate here, I just want this whole country to ourselves!” So much of politics today is dominated by the voices of people who act like spoiled little kids. Grow up! We share the country, you have to have neighbours! You have to occasionally cross paths with other people!

      Not saying this guy holds any anti immigrant sentiment btw, I don’t know the guy, but it’s this thread of entitlement that I see running through politics that catches my eye. Despite the stereotypes, it is most often people of a conservative bent who act this way too, as well as business owners and wealth holders. Regardless of what you think of them, people on the left are crying out to pay more in taxes if it leads to better healthcare, more social housing, free education. There’s a real “fuck you, got mine” flavour to the centre and right that is so juvenile.

    20. whereohwhereohwhere on

      Michael also didn’t want to live next to a Metro station in central Dublin so

    21. Excellent-Night-4148 on

      He’s right, I wanna get out town in a few years for peace and quiet

    22. I disagree profoundly, I live in the countryside and I love it. But I would love the option of being able to live in a city but I had to make choices and I built at home. My brother (and his fiancée) is trying the same as the housing they can afford near his job is tiny. I am single and had so much less of choice.

      I live on site that part of my dad’s farm and the planning process to get permission is a ball ache. However every side road near me is nearly full of one off houses. I call them rural streets. You can see the farmers who didn’t need to sell sites or have kids as they still have road frontage.

      One housing is a too much of a thing as there are no options in our towns and cities. And we are running out of space. We can not keep expanding our towns and cities into even more of a sprawling mess than they already are. One off housing is contributing to the problem, it is a reaction to the symptoms of a non functioning housing system and planning system.

    23. Leaving aside the aesthetics of one-off rural housing (it’s not great, admittedly), does anyone know of any actual data on how much more a family living in a rural home costs the exchequer when compared with that same family living in a town? Controlling for income, etc. I just ask as I’m really not sure of the scale here, and I fear this whole thing could just deepen the rural/urban divide while the same factors that have been making life difficult for us continue to plague the country.

    24. To be fair since moving to an estate I’ve completely changed my mind on one off housing.

      The amount of ppl who call to your door in an estate trying to sell you stuff is egregious. It’s non stop

    25. Okay, but pay the actual cost of providing power to these houses. And stop objecting to wind farms. And don’t complain about not being able to drive drunk home.

    26. Everyone in this country is either is being fucked by the housing crisis or knows someone who is, over half of the young people in this country are living with family still but no WE’RE sorry you’re so right how could we not think of your precious view, go fuck yourself

    27. Ive lived in dublin for a bit (8-9years).

      It sucks. I have no space to build a workshop for my hobbies (working on cars/motorcycles/machining/welding etc) like I enjoyed at home, my motorcycles have been stolen once and attempted stolen twice, theres constant just background noise I can never get used to (theres trains blowing horns at 2:30am at sandyford depot? I thought they shut off at midnight?) I dont like living beside people and cars and just….it’s just loud and unnerving, I often drive 1hr30minutes home just so I can enjoy home, my old bed, the animals, the space to work on my personal projects etc

      Now Im looking to buy and I hate the locals only conditions, because Im local to Carlow, I could build there, but I need to commute to Dublin (only place for work) so rock and a hard place. Im trying to see if I can get somewhere in the wicklow area with an acre site or so to build a workshop but its tough.

      I understand why the restrictions exist….but I will never be comfortable somewhere loud with little space and am more than happy to tolerate worse roads, pay for my own well,septic tank etc. The only real extra costs are the roads, the electricity and the fibre cables, which for the most part already exist, its just extra maintenance and I dont really mind if there was increased utility bills to go with them.

    28. The_Fart_Mongerer on

      McDowell, architect of the 27th Amendment and creator of stateless children in this country. Not a great one to follow on „neighbours“

    29. keanehoodies on

      Tough? We live in a society where by definition we are impacted by our choices and the choices of others.

      If you want to live in the middle of no where, then you cant complain about not being able to drive into the centre fo your nearest settlement. Because everyone else decided to live close together and use more efficient travel

    30. LopsidedTelephone574 on

      Said Irish boomer.

      Omg people get some Europeans to do urban planning and public transport consult.

    Leave A Reply