Die meisten Amerikaner sagen, dass die KI-Entwicklung zu schnell voranschreitet, und doppelt so viele sind KI-Pessimisten wie KI-Optimisten

    https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54762-most-americans-say-artificial-intelligence-ai-development-moving-too-fast-twice-as-many-ai-pessimists-as-ai-optimists-may-9-11-2026-economist-yougov-poll

    Share.

    24 Kommentare

    1. Flying_Ghostsquatch on

      Most Americans are to stupid to see that their president protects Pedos and is likely a pedo himself. America is a global embarrassment.

    2. Maladaptivism on

      I’d feel a lot better about it if it wasn’t being developed by literally the worst human beings on the planet, maybe ones that weren’t openly against democracy, regulation, repeatedly ignored rule of law when they want (included, but not limited to raping children) and say things like „The problem with America is that there no longer is an aristocratic ruling class anymore“, which is barely even paraphrased. Fuck those incestuous sychophants, they’re only acting this way because they’re walking around with their buttholes unfortunately unspidered (Billionaire tax *is* the compromise).

      Kind regards,
      Not an American.

    3. DeathSpiral321 on

      When there’s tons of articles gleefully saying how AI is going to eliminate millions of jobs, how could anyone be optimistic about it?

    4. Fantastic-Place5501 on

      AI optimists are the people building it and investing in it.
      AI pessimists are the people who will be replaced by it. makes perfect sense.

    5. ThatGuyFromSpyKids3D on

      Every article about AI is about how it will replace jobs, data centers will use billions of gallons of water, have immense effects on the local environment, and strain the power supply forcing the additional cost onto consumers.

      Yet you want us to be… Optimistic?

    6. Moving so fast that historians are going to spend decades analyzing why we allowed an inherently unreliable technology (LLMs) to spread like wildfire through our information systems? 

    7. It would be very different if the benefits and portion of profits were being shared equally with workers. Newsflash, they are not.

    8. Sad-Dirt-1660 on

      all i hear when ai is promoted are fraud, fraud, and more fraud. as in, „we’re faking it but it’s okay cus progress!“

    9. No_Delivery_329 on

      They are literally building an AI data center in Utah the size of 2,000 Walmarts…

    10. Embarrassed_Quit_450 on

      Really having blockchain flashbacks. Vastly overstated capabilities, gold rush, bubble pops.

    11. volfan4life87 on

      I hope you’ve all seen Elysium because that’s the future the billionaires are gunning for with AI & robotics, except there will be no Matt Damon to save us.

    12. CondiMesmer on

      Maybe the overwhelming amount of astroturfing and forcefully shoving it in our faces is a bad thing. It’s not consensual either, it’s at the whim of tech giants that control everything.

    13. I am fine with AI as a concept. There’s actually a story that I am fond of that explains why I think AI is a good idea as a whole. Its just we have a bunch of grifters not developing it like they should. Gen AI is fine for gathering ideas. A good idea for building a foundation and getting inspiration. But past a certain point its useless.

      As well. Automation is something we need to have in the event we genocide ourselves and reduce the population because of nuclear warfare. We need to have serious automation and AI that actually works in the event we destroy ourselves to a point where we dont have enough people to rebuild after a potential WWIII.

      If you want a little more about where I got these thoughts, read They Answered The Call by Repulsive-Ardor. It kind of helped me put my feelings on AI into perspective.

    14. AI = You will lose your job, billionaires will get richer and robots might kill you to protect the new techno fascist aristocratic class.

      Of course everyone but the billionaires are pessimistic about that. And the billionaires who are optimistic, see this as an amazing opportunity to get rid of the “lazy” and “entitled” poor that have been leeching off of them. They will weaponize AI against everyone below a certain tax bracket the second that they no longer need their brains or labor.

      If AI meant the average person benefited from less work, more time off and the same or better quality of life then everyone would be supportive.

    15. most usa people know no nothing about what there ask.

      why are you spreading mis info?

    16. The ones who are AI optimists may need to be rounded up and sent to re-education camps. It might simply be too dangerous to have people like that roaming around in society.

    17. that billboard is literally the plot of the Matrix, who thought that was a good idea?

    18. I’m not American, but it’s hard to be optimistic about the beginning of our lives in a surveillance state. It’s no coincidence that with the advent of effective automated surveillance technology we are suddenly seeing country after country pushing for mandatory government IDs on the internet.

    19. It’s a business model predicated on theft. Other than the blatant corruption this should not be legal.

    20. I don’t think either of those things, I think that regardless of the speed, it’s bad software. I don’t want bad software faster or slower, I want the bad software to not be there.

    Leave A Reply