Der Eigentümer schrieb mir nach einem Kommentar, den ich gemacht hatte, eine Nachricht und behauptete, er sei voreingenommen. Ich habe nie auf ihre Nachricht geantwortet und sie wurde daher gelöscht.
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1t2oolw
Von Hospuales
15 Kommentare
I mean it’s owned by the Labour Party. You can’t expect much
I don’t see any bias at all. Especially when one leader is noted as „needed“ and another as „uninformed“. /S
Of course, journal.mt stands for objective and analytical and honest and mystical journalism. They would rather kill themselves than be yet another thinly disguised propaganda tool in Labour’s multi million Euro arsenal.
Not at all https://adstransparency.google.com/?origin=ata®ion=MT&domain=thejournal.mt
It’s owned by the PL. So you’re calling out official party media for not being independent? Did you check net news lately? How about calling out the church news portal for being a de-fact PN club?
Propaganda
It’s kind of similar to Ricky and Wenzu or whatever he calls himself
Ghalhekk iqazzuk tal-labour: Ghamel il-programm tieghek, u halli n-nies jiddeciedu b’mohhom. Le. Nilghabuha tad-dojoq u tat-teknici. Propaganda, manuvri, u hmieg. Umbghad, minn taht, konsulenzi u siggijiet u bordijiet lil kull min hu tal qalba u “jghin”.
Lol, name and shame the account. Fuck these propaganda outlets
Isn’t it literally owned by PL?
yeah right
and Cicciolina is a virgin
I did not know I was looking at ONE news articles 😭
Good on you for calling them out even though I have never heard of them before.
so what was the message?!
I’ve seen loads of Labour online ads paid for by [journal.mt](http://journal.mt) and one.com.mt. I hope those will be included in campaign expenditure and not a loophole that’s being exploited, just like both parties put the debt on their ‚media companies‘ instead of the party.