„…In some parts it is happening at an average rate of 0.78 inches (2 centimeters) a month, according to NASA’s newly released report, such as at the main airport and the iconic monument commonly known as the Angel of Independence.
Overall that means a yearly subsidence rate of about 9.5 inches (24 centimeters). Over the course of less than a century, the drop has been more than 39 feet (12 meters)….“
Mr_Stealy_ on
Yeah, that’ll happen when you build a city in a lake…..
„other areas for city building are available“.
yanocupominomb on
And don’t forget the constant water issues.
That’s why I moved out.
Dnfire17 on
The technology used to measure ground displacement from space is called InSAR. This is actually my field of work and i’ve processed data over Mexico city several times using Sentinel data. Some areas are sinking even more rapidly than what’s stated in the article, upwards of 30 cm per year.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
FlickrReddit on
They need to move their seat of government while it’s still visible.
Father_Dowling on
You can see it in Centro, it’s sadly pretty impressive.
Blackintosh on
What is it sinking about?
98VoteForPedro on
You can see anything from space with a 500x zoom
Isosorbide on
Scientifically, what are the actual consequences of this? If a city is sinking, what’s the potential outcome that needs to be mitigated against? Is it damage to infrastructure, is it the future implications of a drained aquifer, or what?
Put more briefly, why does it matter that the city is sinking? What are the dangerous consequences?
Or is it just more of an interesting bit of trivia about whaty happens when you build a city in a lake bed.
vanityinlines on
I only knew about Italy and Florida. Are there other areas of the world that are currently sinking?
math-yoo on
I visited last year. All the older buildings are crooked and I was shorter.
Briantastically on
Every time I see “can be seen from space” my first thought is how the optics and sensors are what is really being measured, and the object isn’t relevant.
MiloAstro on
Seems like Mictlantecuhtli is not pleased at the lack of sacrifice over the last five centuries.
ScottyMo1 on
Mexico City: the next Venice
ggouge on
Maybe building a city in drained lake was a bad idea
Gloorplz on
I’m not an astronaut, but I’d assume Mexico city could be seen from space before it started sinking.
Quarter_Twenty on
Checks math: It will be at sea level in 9,300 years.
quickasafox777 on
Starting to think the Spanish made some poor decisions in the region (destroying a massive city built into a lake, draining the lake and then building another heavier city on the remains of the lakebed)
kickinpanda on
You can see a lot of things from space.
user0987234 on
Need some Dutch expertise!
Start with lots of caissons and platforms to shore up foundations.
tmfkslp on
How do you still manage to have functioning water and sewer with that rate of collapse? Seems like any underground piping would be automatically fucked. Genuinely curious if anyone has an answer.
AmbientSociopath on
Are there lots of sinkholes in Mexico City? just wondering
It seems like it hasn’t even reached terminal speed for decent into the ground which is a disturbing thought.
symphonicrox on
Wasn’t it essentially built on a lake? Back when the Aztecs were there?
No_Credibility on
What do you expect when you build a metropolis literally on a lake
Bushboy2000 on
Iirc, the entire population of Australia lives in Mexico City.
Same for Tokyo or close to it.
karbaayen on
And yet the article does not feature any satellite photos.
Maycrofy on
The rest of Mexico: „Not fast enough“
ModeatelyIndependant on
Mexico isn’t able/willing to stop pumping water from under the dry lake bed. If the city could find another source, the sinking could slowdown or or even reverse.
StrawberryKiz on
Moctezuma’s Revenge.
Imaginary_Manner_556 on
One of the world’s greatest cities. It’s a shame
No_Worldliness_7106 on
Sinking so „quickly“ it can be seen from space is like saying „I’m walking so fast I can be seen from a block over“. It doesn’t make sense. It is sinking at such a widespread scale that the sinking is noticeable, not the pace. If it sank over the course of 10,000 years it would still be visible from space if we had an observer to watch that long or keep records and photos.
Engineers, is there anything that can be done to save the city?
4RCH43ON on
Subsidence is a major global issue for many large cities and agricultural regions that have overdrawn their water table, often leading to irreversible aquifer collapse.
SouthSouthBay on
I mean you can see a flea bite a mouse from space these days…
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
36 Kommentare
„…In some parts it is happening at an average rate of 0.78 inches (2 centimeters) a month, according to NASA’s newly released report, such as at the main airport and the iconic monument commonly known as the Angel of Independence.
Overall that means a yearly subsidence rate of about 9.5 inches (24 centimeters). Over the course of less than a century, the drop has been more than 39 feet (12 meters)….“
Yeah, that’ll happen when you build a city in a lake…..
„other areas for city building are available“.
And don’t forget the constant water issues.
That’s why I moved out.
The technology used to measure ground displacement from space is called InSAR. This is actually my field of work and i’ve processed data over Mexico city several times using Sentinel data. Some areas are sinking even more rapidly than what’s stated in the article, upwards of 30 cm per year.
[deleted]
They need to move their seat of government while it’s still visible.
You can see it in Centro, it’s sadly pretty impressive.
What is it sinking about?
You can see anything from space with a 500x zoom
Scientifically, what are the actual consequences of this? If a city is sinking, what’s the potential outcome that needs to be mitigated against? Is it damage to infrastructure, is it the future implications of a drained aquifer, or what?
Put more briefly, why does it matter that the city is sinking? What are the dangerous consequences?
Or is it just more of an interesting bit of trivia about whaty happens when you build a city in a lake bed.
I only knew about Italy and Florida. Are there other areas of the world that are currently sinking?
I visited last year. All the older buildings are crooked and I was shorter.
Every time I see “can be seen from space” my first thought is how the optics and sensors are what is really being measured, and the object isn’t relevant.
Seems like Mictlantecuhtli is not pleased at the lack of sacrifice over the last five centuries.
Mexico City: the next Venice
Maybe building a city in drained lake was a bad idea
I’m not an astronaut, but I’d assume Mexico city could be seen from space before it started sinking.
Checks math: It will be at sea level in 9,300 years.
Starting to think the Spanish made some poor decisions in the region (destroying a massive city built into a lake, draining the lake and then building another heavier city on the remains of the lakebed)
You can see a lot of things from space.
Need some Dutch expertise!
Start with lots of caissons and platforms to shore up foundations.
How do you still manage to have functioning water and sewer with that rate of collapse? Seems like any underground piping would be automatically fucked. Genuinely curious if anyone has an answer.
Are there lots of sinkholes in Mexico City? just wondering
It seems like it hasn’t even reached terminal speed for decent into the ground which is a disturbing thought.
Wasn’t it essentially built on a lake? Back when the Aztecs were there?
What do you expect when you build a metropolis literally on a lake
Iirc, the entire population of Australia lives in Mexico City.
Same for Tokyo or close to it.
And yet the article does not feature any satellite photos.
The rest of Mexico: „Not fast enough“
Mexico isn’t able/willing to stop pumping water from under the dry lake bed. If the city could find another source, the sinking could slowdown or or even reverse.
Moctezuma’s Revenge.
One of the world’s greatest cities. It’s a shame
Sinking so „quickly“ it can be seen from space is like saying „I’m walking so fast I can be seen from a block over“. It doesn’t make sense. It is sinking at such a widespread scale that the sinking is noticeable, not the pace. If it sank over the course of 10,000 years it would still be visible from space if we had an observer to watch that long or keep records and photos.
Well the entire city is built on a lake basin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Texcoco
Engineers, is there anything that can be done to save the city?
Subsidence is a major global issue for many large cities and agricultural regions that have overdrawn their water table, often leading to irreversible aquifer collapse.
I mean you can see a flea bite a mouse from space these days…