Share.

12 Kommentare

  1. TheNational_News on

    US bureau chief explains why continuing hostilities after May 1 without congressional authorisation would put the administration in violation. He spoke to Michael Glennon, who as a young lawyer in 1973 helped craft the War Powers Resolution.
    Glennon said: “It’s clearly beyond the Constitutional authority of the President, acting without congressional approval, because there was no likelihood of an imminent attack on the United States or its armed forces.”

  2. Schwartzy94 on

    Why even is there such law that allows president to be a dictator about wars for 60 days?

  3. Does the Trump administration even care about law? Who will *enforce* the War Powers Act for real?

  4. It won’t be. This Congress is absolutely spineless (on both sides of the isle – with a few notable outliers).

    GOP members are way too scared of Trump to ever cross the isle and even Dems are scared which is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen. Primary them all.

  5. NatalieSoleil on

    Stupidity meets the law. But they are crooks. So they will bend the rules = toral mess.
    Already tired of this situation? Nice one. More shit to come

  6. tradconcarne on

    The War Powers Resolution has no enforcement mechanism, as any lawsuit would likely have to come from the Executive Branch/DOJ and would be found unconstitutional anyway.

    Congress cannot pass a law that limits another branch, just as Congress couldn’t pass a law and say the Supreme Court’s decisions are only valid for 60 days.

    Yes, only Congress declares war, but we haven’t been in a declared war since WW2 and we’ve been in many “wars” since then somehow.

  7. OutsideMarketing1929 on

    And what if after ceasefire he start it again? Does he care about law?

Leave A Reply