ABC kann die Lizenzbedrohung des US-Präsidenten FCC abwehren, wenn Eigentümer Disney bereit ist zu kämpfen | Aufgrund der Gesetzesänderung in den USA im Jahr 1996 erfolgt die Erneuerung von Rundfunklizenzen „so gut wie automatisch“.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/abc-can-beat-trump-fccs-license-threat-if-owner-disney-is-willing-to-fight/
25 Kommentare
It’s obvious that Carr is bluffing; they’re just testing D’Amaro. All the House of Mouse’s lawyers have to do is walk in to court and play a “best of” montage of all the festering, inflammatory rhetoric that’s spewed by Fox’s hosts.
Obviously they can. All the Trump administration does is lose lawsuits.
As soon as someone explains to them what the word fight means.
The Mouse is wise in the ways of law.
He makes his own lanham
Disney better learn that consumers will be punishing them if they bend to Facists
>if owner Disney is willing to fight
Well, so much for that.
If they don’t fight I’m done with disney
Law. How quaint.
The Mouse bows to no one.
If it’s a legal cage match between Disney lawyers and the Trump administration, I am putting all my chips on Disney.
Its basically saying if disney is willing to spend money they wont see a return on in year they can win.
Yeah its not happening they will fold instantly.
In an age where the supreme court will undo laws and ignore stare decisis to appease the king, nothing is all but automatic.
Because the law matters so much now…
Looks like Tacos I’ll be served soon
nothing to do with tech this is politics
The only time I can recall the FCC revoking the license of a station was back in the 80s when RKO hid evidence of some kind of fraud . Even that was tied up in court for years.
This effort will not go far, even if the commission quickly votes to reject the renewals. Disney has good lawyers and nothing will happen unless the FCC has a smoking gun of evidence of misconduct (they don’t)
ABC can afford many more and much better lawyers. Decimating DOJ is going to come back to bite Trump.
Arstechnica’s headlines are being written by someone with English as their 2nd language.
I’m sure they’d drop it for a big enough bribe.
The law, lol.
The problem is that the fight may unleash other things where even though they win this battle, the court system does something that is more damaging to them. This is why they caved before with George Stephonopolis. There was some serious possibility of libel law challenges that this supreme court could have done some significant damage with.
lol laws matter?
Who gives a shit fuck each and every single person involved.
And if they appease Trump, then, the goalpost gets moved. Nothing is ever good enough, or correct enough
So….should I say “8647” or “expectant widow” to offend someone, or both. I don’t want to “not” offend someone on social media.