Close Menu
    Daten

    [OC] KI-generierte Artikel überholten im Jahr 2025 die von Menschen verfassten

    Share.
    View 12 Comments

    12 Kommentare

    3. Hazzat on

      Needs a lot more context. What kind of articles? Where were they posted? How is it determined if one was AI-generated or not?

    4. jake6501 on

      Considering how unreliable AI detection is, I wouldn’t consider these results fully reliable, but with a quick glance at the methodology this might be somewhat close.

    5. PacquiaoFreeHousing on

      To be fair article reading has been an all time low ever since google started summarizing results with AI. People don’t really need to click links anymore, the information they need just comes out from google’s AI.

    6. fr0z3nf1r3 on

      I am okay with AI assisted articles. Grammerly existed well before AI. 

      It’s the churning out of no-effort content that has not even been read by the author that pisses me off.

    7. AlertGuest5105 on

      Interesting, but what’s the source here? What counts as ‘AI-generated’?

    8. imissmyhat on

      Not surprising. I see claudisms in even very high-profile newspapers these days. The lower-tier ones probably just have AI do the whole thing.

    9. uncertainschrodinger on

      I think it would be interesting to see the total number of articles because I assume a lot more people/companies are publishing articles (for SEO and LLM optimization) which takes up a bigger percentage, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it took away from articles that a person would’ve written.

    12. joecarvery on

      This data is up to May 2025 (according to the methods, not sure why the figure is maximum January), so it’s probably got quite a bit worse.

    Leave A Reply