Zack Polanksi erzählt Ed Balls in der hitzigen Auseinandersetzung um Good Morning Britain, dass er „der Grund dafür ist, dass Menschen die Medien hassen“.
https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/zack-polanksi-ed-balls-good-morning-britain-video-b2965557.html
Von The-Peel
21 Kommentare
[removed]
I really don’t see why a rational centre left party is too much to hope for.
[removed]
Well he doesn’t answer the question does he? Straight into „whatabout!!“
And Ed Balls calls him out on it!
Seems like Polanski is rattled there. That is one of their policies, and it is Polanski using „shock jock“ tactics to try and avoid answering that.
I’m guessing he won’t be celebrating Ed Balls Day tomorrow then. Pity.
Honestly, it’s quite impressive how well-coached Zack is to never answer the question about the migration policy.
The faux outrage lets him completely avoid answering the question. Presumably because he knows that the Greens‘ policy is likely to be insanely unpopular with the public because it is de facto open borders + massive incentives for millions to come over, get incredibly generous benefits, and suppress the wages of workers in the UK.
As Zack never answers the question though, the full policy document is here to read and see that this is one of those rare occasions where the right wing press might actually be underselling how mad it is. [https://migration.greenparty.org.uk//wp-content/uploads/2021/02/GPEW-Migration-Policy-Background-Paper-v1.2.pdf](https://migration.greenparty.org.uk//wp-content/uploads/2021/02/GPEW-Migration-Policy-Background-Paper-v1.2.pdf)
Does he only want to be soft-balled questions by people who already support him?
Whether Balls is biased or not is irrelevant here – the entire point of these interviews is to test if his policies can hold up to scrutiny. Even if the interviewer wasn’t a Labour man, his job as interviewer would be to play the opposition. It doesn’t make a blind bit of difference here.
In the last couple of days Polanski has downplayed Putin’s atrocities and attacked the media for doing its job and scrutinising him. He says he hates Trump but I can see a few things they have in common.
Same as Farage- attack the question and the interviewer for asking the question you can’t answer, rather than having policies solid enough to answer the question
Does anyone have the lead up to this?
It doesn’t seem to be in the link and makes a big difference if this was an appropriate time to bring up what is arguably a fair point in a different discussion.
[removed]
Just watched the interview, regardless of the individual policies, I think Polanski comes off very badly. Yes, he’s right that local councillors don’t decide national policy, but Balls is generally right that these policies are part of the Green party literature, and they’ve given almost nothing else to judge Green party candidates on, and that many of the things Polanski does want to talk about are national policy. How else should you judge a generic political party candidate other than that party’s literature? They’re hardly going to ask about potholes in a particular village in Shropshire. Particularly as he moves from the political fringe to the mainstream, criticising his interviewers rather than responding to them reminds me more and more of Trump’s refrain that anyone asking questions of him are very bad, horrible people.
I mean yeah? The guy’s married to the Foreign Secretary and we’re meant to treat him as though he’s some sort of nice bloke who can hold power to account because he failed to use Twitter properly fifteen years ago.
The absolute look of rage on his face and his rising voice when he was „being ACCUSED“ of being a former Labour minister is not that of a man who’s unaware that he’s part of a chummy media class rewarding failed politicians so long as nobody rocks the boat too hard.
Though, you know, maybe like his wife and her colleagues he was on the piss early, since that’s acceptable if the Greens don’t like it.
The Green Party are just left wing populists.
Im going to be clear, im a left wing person, I want society to help its fellow man. But all I see from this iteration of the Green Party is the same. Senseless arguments, hatred of scrutiny and easy answers to complicated problems is what the far right offers in their own way.
I want solutions not gimmicks.
Polanski again showing he’s a bit of an idiot.
He really doesn’t like questions, he gets almost as upset as Corbyn used to.
Uh oh, the enlightened centrists of the sub won’t like this one bit
There are far worse people in the media than Ed Balls and Good Morning Britain, many of whom will use this outburst to mock Polanski and the Green Party. If Polanski is struggling on lightweight breakfast TV then he is going to find the intense scrutiny from the general newspapers much, much worse.
Polanski being terminally online is a big part of what cured my doomscrolling.
What I found amazing about this exchange is that Balls sounded so offended yet last year when Polanski went on GMB, Balls essentially asked him to not to run green candidates in by elections and to let labour win to keep out reform.
He even said that the greens were stealing votes from labour.
For me there should be a blanket ban on anyone who’s had a political career hosting any sort of tv show.
Bad interviewer and terrible interviewee. Zack is pure cringe and I don’t understand how people can vote for Greens.
How can any logical person think that open borders are a good idea?
While i don’t agree with all of the greens‘ policies, i am so glad polanski is doing what he is doing, because it’s a counter to the effect that has been pulling the center towards the right for god knows how long because that is what „gets the voters“.
A strong enough left wing party means labour will have to drift left to try to not lose voters to them, rather than the current situation where they instead are drifting right to try to appeasd the farages of the world