Die weltweite Solarstromerzeugung ist mit 2.779 TWh um 30 % höher als im Jahr 2025. Mit 2.713 TWh ist sie zum ersten Mal mehr als die Stromerzeugung aus Windenergie und liegt mit 2.812 TWh nahe an der weltweiten Stromerzeugung aus Kernenergie.
Datenquelle Ember, Tools-Web-App ERC (Economic RESTful Client).
Von webapperc
11 Kommentare
It paints a good picture but takes a long time to understand this graph.
Including the rate of growth in green bars is distracting (it doesn’t really have a legend, so I’m assuming that’s what it is). Adding the legend text at the top rather than along each line is an odd choice.
Very good info in a not beautiful graph.
If this is accurate, that’s a beautiful exponential curve on solar.
What’s R1 and L1?
Left and right axes are the others way round.
Depends how much you’re holding, but for smaller amounts a decent home safe can sometimes make more sense.
Why’s wind slowing down? Saturation of easy to access spots for farms?
Oh look the nuclear renaissance clearly at display!
Did you vibe code this chart? Why are so many people allergic to proper chart labelling?
What do the bars represent?
Solar is scaling really fast and now the storage is a big constraint
A little confusing. You need to label the axes properly instead of just in the title.
This sure feels like a very misleading graph… so I tried to dig into the data source. Ember seems to be an advocacy/lobbying site. My main question is whether this is simply installed capacity (generally a useless measure for comparison) or actual electrical generation. Obviously, it is easy to have huge growth on a minute number like solar. Note that nuclear is considered a clean generation source these days and it’s high capacity factors make it more effective.