Close Menu
    Politics

    Trump ordnete in den Klagen vom 6. Januar an, zu erklären, warum „die Ermittlungen nicht gegen ihn erfolgen sollten“.

    Share.
    View 29 Comments

    29 Kommentare

    1. marzgamingmaster on

      „because I’m the president, nothing I do can be illegal“ there, solved it for him. Unfortunately, that’s the system we’ve bent over backwards to create.

    3. Neat-Boysenberry-67 on

      „Your Honor, I object!“

      „Why?“

      „Because it’s devastating to my case!“

      „Overruled.“

    5. Cold-Cell2820 on

      „Because, your honor, if this case involves evidence, I will lose it“

    6. StevenMC19 on

      >“President Trump shall show cause by April 29, 2026, why merits discovery should not proceed against him. His response shall be no more than ten pages,“ the Barack Obama-appointed jurist added.

      I feel like that last bit was unnecessary. Almost feels like they’re trying to frame the individual as biased.

    7. fowlraul on

      He’s still on that “total immunity”bullshit fucking voters man…🙄🙄🙄

    9. Hyperica on

      I’m happy it’s (maybe) happening, but it feels like it’s a few years too late.

    12. IllTwo7643 on

      Do you guys think he’s gonna go on a rant on truth social and then…… I don’t know how to put this without a reddit ban…. Go on a permanent vacation from breathing?
      Isnt that what narcissistic collapse can end with?

    13. Poison_the_Phil on

      A bunch of goddamn mouthbreathers really elected a fucking toddler to rule over them. Stupid, stupid, stupid fucks

    15. watching_whatever on

      Whatever trump did here is now small peanuts compared to what should be numerous forthcoming lawsuits.

    16. zeradragon on

      „Because I don’t like what you’re going to find and it hurts my feelings, so therefore it’s very illegal“

    17. 1-800-WhoDey on

      Another instance of the wealthy being protected by the law but not bound by it while everyone else is bound by the law but not protected by it.

    18. mokivj on

      He or rather President Stephen Miller will issue an EO stating discover should not proceed.

    22. SnooPuppers8698 on

      he;ll pay the lawsuit with the money he stole from taxpayers lmao. zero consequences for the trump crime family ever

    23. Kind-Philosopher5077 on

      *He’s the president of the United States of America and did everything he could to protect himself and his pedophile friends*

    25. dmetzcher on

      This is a *civil* case.

      There’s always some confusion about the SCOTUS ruling.

      The president has immunity from actions associated with his core constitutional powers.

      The court also said that the president has *presumed* immunity for other official acts, but this presumption could theoretically be overcome, although it’s not going to be easy for a prosecutor.

      The Supreme Court did not rule on *civil* cases. They did not say he is immune from *civil* lawsuits.

      Yes, the court did grant the president an insane amount of immunity from criminal prosecution, and I’d argue that the Founders never intended this, but he is not protected from civil lawsuits, and presumed immunity for certain acts can be overcome. It hasn’t been tested yet, but it will be tested by someone against some president someday.

    28. KinkyPaddling on

      Our legal system is fundamentally broken if we’re still doing this dance, whereas Brazil and South Korea were able to nip their dictator-wannabes right in the ass.

    Leave A Reply