Gericht an Bondi: Die Forderung, dass Plattformen Reden zensieren und bei Fox News damit prahlen, ist in der Tat ein Verstoß gegen den ersten Verfassungszusatz
Gericht an Bondi: Die Forderung, dass Plattformen Reden zensieren und bei Fox News damit prahlen, ist in der Tat ein Verstoß gegen den ersten Verfassungszusatz
8 Kommentare
Isn’t this literally what they all claimed the so called “Twitter Files” were about? So much hypocrisy.
Didn’t the previous administration do this as well?
> CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote to the House Judiciary Committee alleging that senior Biden administration officials, including those from the White House, “repeatedly pressured” Facebook for months to remove certain COVID-19 content including humor and satire, and “expressed a lot of frustration” when Facebook didn’t comply. Zuckerberg wrote: “I believe the government pressure was wrong and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.”
> White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated in July 2021 that the administration was “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” and clarified the White House was in regular contact with social media companies.
But it was okay back then.
Have the judges not been paid the appropriate bribes? What is happenig in the MAGA land of corruption that judges would talk back to MAGA officials? or is this what happens when the King boots you out of his court – the Judges are then able to pursue crimes again.
Pam Bondi, being a former AG of FL, one would think she’d have at least a cursory-level understanding of how the First Amendment works. Turns out, even that is apparently not a requirement of the job.
Cool, so what happens to her now. I mean she no longer has Trump’s protection so CLEARLY she’s going to suffer some sort of punishment for violating the Constitution… right?
Another non-technology post in /r/technology
Articles like this have taught me enough about law I now believe I would be qualified for a high level position at the current DOJ.
She’s dumber than dirt.