LayerZero macht Kelps Setup für den 290-Millionen-Dollar-Exploit verantwortlich und schreibt es dem nordkoreanischen Unternehmen Lazarus zu
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/04/20/layerzero-blames-kelp-s-setup-for-usd290-million-exploit-attributes-it-to-north-korea-s-lazarus
2 Kommentare
Yawn. Layerzero themselves literally signed the 1/1 bad message. Time to play the blame game when you know youre fucked.
If the entire point of a DVN is customizable/modular security, then why does a 1-of-1 configuration even exist in the first place? If the system allows this option, it’s not the fault of the customer who chose it, it’s a fundamental design flaw by the system that permitted it in the first place.
When will people learn the lesson and move away from insecure Solidity based garbage? Too many ways for programmers to shoot themselves and their users in the feet.
Move on Sui and Aptos seems to be less insecure.
Haskel on Cardano too I assume.
What else is less insecure than Solidity?