Der Anwalt von Keystone Kash weist noch verheerendere Ansprüche zurück | Als das Rechtsteam des FBI-Direktors einen Bericht von The Atlantic angegriffen hat, deckte es Vorwürfe auf, die zuvor nicht öffentlich waren.

>The first is an allegation that Patel was viewed as a “threat to public safety,” including concerns about how he would respond in the event of a domestic terror attack. The phrase “threat to public safety” was not in The Atlantic’s report.
>>The second is that an allegation that he once had his security detail shut down the FBI Association Store so he could shop alone, and complained that the merchandise “wasn’t intimidating enough.” The claim that the merchandise was not sufficiently intimidating was published; that the store was shut down by his detail was not.
That means that the letter, which came from a personal attorney for Patel rather than from the FBI’s own counsel, effectively put what it describes as false and defamatory statements into public circulation.

read entire article: https://archive.ph/ZYNwV#selection-859.0-879.207