
Vizeministerin, die gegen die Regeln zu Interessenkonflikten verstoßen hat, hätte sagen sollen, dass sie einen Fehler gemacht hat, sagt Expertin
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-deputy-minister-who-breached-conflict-of-interest-rules-should-have/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
14 Kommentare
Liberals are a truly ‚big-tent‘ party now. Anything goes. I’m sure there was something ‚pragmatic‘ about demanding her useless friend be given a cushy job.
No worries. They’ll be changing the makeup of the ethics committee soon. We won’t even hear about these things soon.
This didn’t require an expert
[https://archive.ph/vkP9O](https://archive.ph/vkP9O)
Should have done the thing the government is known for not doing…
“Oopsie daisies.” The official motto of this government and its bureaucrats.
>Ms. Zellars said many able Black public servants have been stagnating for years in federal jobs. Rather than intervening to help an acquaintance land a management job in her department, she believes Ms. Fox should have “looked inside of the system and said who is here that has stagnated? Let me see what racialized person is deserving of an opportunity.”
She didn’t do this because that wasn’t her real intention. She got caught hiring a friend and tried to use „anti-racism“ as an excuse instead of just saying „I messed up“.
By framing the hiring of her husband’s unqualified and inexperienced cousin as practicing DEI, she misrepresents the purpose of DEI and reinforces harmful narratives about BIPOC communities.
She should be removed from her posting
Bit ironic that the head of DND is prepared to go down with the ship being sunk by her own torpedo.
Truly a role model for all the sailors in the RCN.
Set the tone. Fire her.
So she broke the rules. Denied it. Got uncovered. I wonder what’s next. Probably say oopsie poopsie I didnt mean it or I experienced it differently and will get a slap on the wrist.
Should be fired. End of story.
We reward them for corruption and incompetence. Why would they feel they have done no wrong when the electorate keeps rewarding them?