OpenAI unterstützt einen Gesetzentwurf des Staates Illinois, um KI-Unternehmen vor Klagen wegen katastrophalen Schadens zu schützen
https://qz.com/openai-illinois-bill-ai-liability-critical-harm-041026
OpenAI unterstützt einen Gesetzentwurf des Staates Illinois, um KI-Unternehmen vor Klagen wegen katastrophalen Schadens zu schützen
https://qz.com/openai-illinois-bill-ai-liability-critical-harm-041026
7 Kommentare
Lol what a surprise
Troubled people are already killing themselves or hurting others based on what ChatGPT tells them. If your product causes harm, your company is liable.
This would be like Purdue Pharma pushing for a shield law for the epidemic of Oxycontin addictions.
This is our issue at work.
People are quoting co-pilot as fact, and even saying “well co-pilot says this”, even if it’s wrong.
We’ve updated or AI framework at work to clearly say that at the end of the day, it’s still your sign off. If you got wrong info from AI (just like if you got wrong info from someone else), the onus is still on you since you’re providing the sign off.
AI is a tool, not a full replacement. If you start using it and treating it as fact, then your job might as well be replaced since AI can do it flawlessly then.
So according to the bill they’re supporting, „frontier“ AI models can only be held liable if they kill 100 people or more, or cause over $1 billion in damage. Anything less is just the cost of progress:
>SB 3444, known as the Artificial Intelligence Safety Act, defines „critical harms“ as events such as the death or serious injury of 100 or more people, at least $1 billion in property damage, or a bad actor using AI to develop a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon. Coverage under the bill is tied to a model’s training expense: any system built on more than $100 million in compute qualifies as a frontier model, a bar that Wired reports would rope in the country’s biggest AI developers, among them OpenAI, Google $GOOGL -0.39%, Anthropic, xAI, and Meta $META +0.23%.
(Gotta love how they add the stock movement in there for your important context.)
Remember when Altman was supposedly pro-regulation?
of course they are