
Negative Auswirkungen künstlicher Süßstoffe könnten sich auf die nächste Generation übertragen, wie Untersuchungen an Mäusen nahelegen. Die Veränderungen der Genexpression, der Glukosetoleranz und des fäkalen Mikrobioms könnten möglicherweise die Anfälligkeit für Erkrankungen wie Diabetes erhöhen – genau das Problem, das die Süßstoffe lösen wollten.
https://www.frontiersin.org/news/2026/04/10/negative-effects-artificial-sweeteners-may-pass-next-generation-frontiers-nutrition
9 Kommentare
Negative effects of artificial sweeteners may pass on to next generation, mouse research suggests
Artificial sweeteners are a popular alternative to sugar, often included in low-sugar or no-sugar foods and beverages marketed at people looking to improve their health. But new research in mice suggests that these sweeteners could have unexpected health impacts which can be passed on to offspring and even to the second generation. The changes observed by the scientists, including gene expression, glucose tolerance, and the fecal microbiome, could potentially increase vulnerability to metabolic health conditions like diabetes — the very problem the sweeteners were trying to solve.
For those interested, here’s the link to the peer reviewed journal article:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2026.1694149/full
I would hope that pregnant women already try and eat anything in moderation during their pregnancy anyway.
From an ethical standpoint, it seems to be increasingly obvious that it is unethical to have children and knowingly pass genetic, epigenetic, and environmental issues like microplastics and ecosystem collapse onto them, when they are in no position to consent to any of that.
This study gave the equivalent of FDA maximum of sucralose, like if someone was eating 25 Splenda packets a day. Not sure if that’s a typical diet for pregnant women.
Sample size is 47 mice, is that a sizeable enough population for this study to mean anything substantive?
Jokes on science, I’m never having kids.
#The sweeteners were never invented to decrease diabetes. They were to be non- or low-calorie.
It looks like both parents in F0 received the “sugar”. I wonder what the effect of only fathers or only mothers would be. Even at the most different, highest dose group, would having only the father expose be evident?
I wonder who financed this study. And who financed them. Lookin‘ at you, Big Sugga.