Sotomayor sagt, KI sei „eine schlechte Sache“, wenn es darum geht, Entscheidungen des Obersten Gerichtshofs vorherzusagen, was zeigt, dass „wir viel zu vorhersehbar sind“
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5824618-sotomayor-ai-judiciary-experiment/
26 Kommentare
Is the Supreme Court supposed to be unpredictable?
Shouldn’t court proceedings be very, very predictable?
They’re way too corrupt, far Right extremist, and most of it’s members are illegitimate. The Court needs to be completely reformed, increased by at least 20 Justices, and the shadow docket needs to be outlawed.
AI is predicting what’s common sense?
The only people that think the Supreme Court isn’t political, is the Supreme Court.
Age limits. For all govt positions. Now!!
Don’t need AI to predict moves of a fascist kangaroo court.
for fucks sake lady this isn’t a contest for originality its a fight for democracy
Let’s make it a wheel of fortune
Oh oh oh conservatives are doing some evil shit and it’s going to be 6-3 or at least 5-4 I’m a predictive genius /s
Girl now is not the time to subvert expectations. Just be normal ffs.
The legal system is supposed to be predictable, that’s how it works.
They should be predictable.
It just should not be predictable along party lines.
Didn’t they make a movie about this with Chris Pratt?
A Judge has to be -Impartial- which means at times they have to be unpredictable.
This sounds like a way for the tech bro dipshits to create yet another gambling scam. Can old politicians stop falling for this garbage? There’s a bunch of 20/30 year olds out there who have stolen millions from the working class thanks to this.
Don’t reward idiocy.
Still insane to me we can’t actually see the court in session via CSPAN.
There is predictability based upon law and precedent, then there is predictability based upon ideology and predetermined decisions. The predictability discussed here is the latter.
Which begs the question on the former. The fact that the actual law and precedent means less than ideology means that there is in fact no real rational basis in law. There is only partisanship and rationalization.
AI can replace Al(ito)
The law should be predictable, actually.
Most of my life you can count on them fabricating fascist bullshit. It has been an issue for 100 years
The Supreme Court should be predictable. The erratic, non sensical, partizan, corrupt shite we have seen the past years are *the problem*.
Predictable is a *good* thing. Democracy needs to be predictable.
Alito and Thomas will always rule for what the republican party wants. They are beyond predictable.
It feels less like an AI problem and more like a transparency one. If decisions follow consistent patterns, models will pick that up. The uncomfortable part is seeing it quantified.
The question is whether that predictability is fairness and stability, or something that can be gamed once it’s obvious.
„partisan“
Stare decisis… While I’ll never.
Well, if you’re following the law, then it should be absolutely predictable, no? 🤔
They’ve got like one major document that they need to empower. Doesn’t get more predictable than that.