Eine Mautgebühr für die Nutzung von Hormuz wäre ein „gefährlicher Präzedenzfall“, sagt die UN-Schiffsbehörde
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/toll-using-hormuz-would-be-dangerous-precedent-uns-ship-agency-says-2026-04-09/
Eine Mautgebühr für die Nutzung von Hormuz wäre ein „gefährlicher Präzedenzfall“, sagt die UN-Schiffsbehörde
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/toll-using-hormuz-would-be-dangerous-precedent-uns-ship-agency-says-2026-04-09/
6 Kommentare
This is what the end of globalism means, and this is going to get a lot more common because the US is retreating because of grotesque stupidity by its people in choosing their representatives.
every country will try to find a choke point and capitalise over it , making geographic location as weapon
This article hits me in a couple ways. It feels like we’ve been drifting toward more regionalism for a while and this is part of that. But it also shows how much the US navy has been doing to keep major shipping lanes open. That kind of stability doesn’t just exist on its own and there aren’t many countries willing or able to take on that role at scale. It also shows how us domestic expectations and global commitments are tied together. Americans want more internal spending but bare the costs of this role they occupy.
It could be avoidable and while Iran been thought of that for while but hold off as not sure if in practice might goes wrong but when USA and Israel attack Iran they felt they got nothing to lose and when practice somehow just goes as according to theory they have new idea to capitalized it
Sometimes not all great strategy came from pure idea or well detail plan but also improvisation and Iran on the strait is latest example so far
Well we will all have to agree to some price for the damage inflicted and have a stop date on the toll once revenue targets have been met. Actions have consequences that smarter administrations used to rightfully consider.
Starting war of choice and attacking countries for no reason is a dangerous precedent too!