Öl verzeichnet den größten Absturz seit 1991 – aber der Waffenstillstand am Golf hat zwei Versionen

***As we see it:***

If the Strait of Hormuz is allowed to become a toll gate, the consequences could reach far beyond one region. It would suggest that a state can convert a vital international passage from a protected route of transit into a source of revenue, coercion, and selective control. As global warming makes additional northern sea routes increasingly viable for seasonal shipping, the number of strategically important passages with disputed legal status is likely to grow. In that setting, even one serious violation of the rule against monetizing transit could encourage similar claims elsewhere and contribute to a broader breakdown in the international rule of law governing freedom of navigation.

***Excerpts:***

Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, this is illegal. UNCLOS Articles 37 through 44 guarantee continuous, free, and non-suspendable transit passage through international straits; Article 26 prohibits any charge levied “by reason only of passage.”

James Kraska, professor of international maritime law at the US Naval War College, said in Türkiye Today that “imposing transit fees is a violation of the rules of transit passage.” Jasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi, Secretary General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, told Shipping & Freight Resource that Iran’s fee collection was “an aggression and a violation of the United Nations agreement on the law of the sea.”

What the ceasefire’s English text describes as “reopening” the Strait of Hormuz is a managed toll corridor under IRGC supervision—whose legal status remains disputed, whose fees remain in place, and whose daily transit count of four or five vessels is a fraction of the pre-war 150.