Trump und Iran haben einen Waffenstillstand erklärt. Sie stimmten nicht denselben Bedingungen zu.
https://brief.gizmet.dev/ceasefire-terms/
Trump und Iran haben einen Waffenstillstand erklärt. Sie stimmten nicht denselben Bedingungen zu.
https://brief.gizmet.dev/ceasefire-terms/
6 Kommentare
SS: Side-by-side comparison of the two ceasefire statements issued on 7 April.
Trump demanded „COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING“ of Hormuz. Araghchi offered military-supervised passage „via coordination with Iran’s Armed Forces“ with undefined „technical limitations.“
Iran’s SNSC separately described the outcome as „the enemy’s surrender on the battlefield.“ Talks scheduled Friday in Islamabad with VP Vance.
At time of publication, Iranian ballistic missile fire into Israel continues and Abu Dhabi’s Habshan gas facility is on fire again. All claims sourced to primary statements and named outlets.
This is very common in this region (and not only here), one message in English another in the local language for internal and regional consumption.
The reality is likely somewhere in between.
There is no way this ceasefire holds. The only question is who attacks first.
Great Trump lost the war, wasted a couple hundred billion to distract from the Epstein files. Iran came out way ahead. Let’s talk about how trump rapes children again.
Make Peace not War is what I hope they agreed to. Food, not Bombs, etc. There must be follow up, but it is ok, for now. This is a potentially good day. One day, one hour, one minute at a time, in recovery.
Each side presented what they want to see as a desired end state. From there, the multiple sides will meet and discuss a path moving forward. The GCC, Israel, Iraq, and Lebanon should be at the table.