Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads [OC] Valenz vs. epistemische Gültigkeit von Scheiß-Redewendungen Von VisibleCauliflower
melanthius on 07.04.2026 4:36 p.m. Can’t stand guys who walk around acting like they are true+good Edit: would it make sense if „holy shit“ was more like a zone which could be either good or bad, and I think definitely more on the true side.
Follow_The_Lore on 07.04.2026 4:38 p.m. Bullshit should be the most false surely? Wtf is this! It’s bullshit.
coffeebribesaccepted on 07.04.2026 4:40 p.m. How is this data? Did you just chart these yourself based on vibes?
limabeanbag on 07.04.2026 4:40 p.m. I disagree with basically all positions here but the idea is very fun
RoamAndRamble on 07.04.2026 5:04 p.m. **The duality of shit** You’re shit = bad You ain’t shit = also bad Scared as shit = really scared Scared shitless = also really scared
7 Kommentare
Can’t stand guys who walk around acting like they are true+good
Edit: would it make sense if „holy shit“ was more like a zone which could be either good or bad, and I think definitely more on the true side.
I am confused by „bullshit,“ that to me is the most false
Bullshit should be the most false surely? Wtf is this! It’s bullshit.
How is this data? Did you just chart these yourself based on vibes?
I disagree with basically all positions here but the idea is very fun
I love it. But i feel like jackshit should be at 0,0
**The duality of shit**
You’re shit = bad
You ain’t shit = also bad
Scared as shit = really scared
Scared shitless = also really scared