Ist es nicht offensichtlich, wie inszeniert das war?
Neben dem Attentat/Psyop auf Charlie Kirk,
Die Menge an Mängeln bei diesem Vorfall veranlasst mich, dieses spezielle Foto in Frage zu stellen. Irgendwie soll dieses berüchtigte Foto etwas darstellen. Kann uns ein professioneller Fotograf erklären, wie bzw. mit welcher Art von Kamera eine Kugel in der Luft eingefangen werden kann? Und muss man zum Fotografieren bereit sein?
Wie kommt es auch, dass niemand wirklich darauf hingewiesen hat, dass die „Kugel“ nicht einmal mit der Stelle übereinstimmt, an der sein Ohr angeblich „getroffen“ wurde?
Von Ok-Contribution-4880
22 Kommentare
What is that line lol
The best proof is in the intact ear, when an old man get injured like that it will always leave a nasty scar.
And the Economist taunted us with it, the „his triump“ cover has his ear as the focus point of the picture.
I just wanna know wtf Baron Coleman found that scared him so much he stopped looking into it.
Weird how this doesn’t get the same play on here that other things do…..🤔
If it was legitimate he would never have shut up about cheating death.
Is this the only bullet to be photographed in flight ever?
Tbh I just tired of politics and it all
Is forensics claiming it’s a picture of a bullet? At first I thought kinda looks like a jet plane’s contrail…edit: yes, a bullet can be caught on image at a shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second.
This one seems real…idk. He looks legitimately afraid in the video…I dont think he’s that good of an actor lol.
It was very unusual to have a famous photographer there with that high shutter speed. Unless he was told to be ready for something, like catching a brain being blown out. And CNN rarely covered Trump rallies, but they were live for this one. There were multiple bullets. I don’t think anyone is claiming the one captured in this picture is the one that clipped him.
Sorry what?
I took photos of myself and a friend at his farm shooing handguns and assault rifles in like 2006. I had a Canon DSLR camera. It was a very sunny day and had the exposure set to very short because of this. I have a few photos of me catching the muzzle flash and the bullets coming out of the guns. That was 20 years ago with older digital photography equipment. With the technology of professional photography equipment today I don’t see how this is impossible.
It’s just a perfectly timed photo, which makes sense as there were dozens of photographers, videographers and press there taking photos during his whole speech. I just don’t understand why so many people don’t believe evidence when it’s right in front of them. I am all for a good conspiracy like all of you are, but don’t forget that someone died that day. Corey Comperatore, was killed while shielding his family. Two other men, David Dutch and James Copenhaver, were critically injured, though they survived. So as much as might seem like this was some sort of psyop or something like that, there is clear proof that there was a shooter. The bullets came from the direction that this photo shows they came from and 3 people were shot, and one was killed.
Never looked into this yet too much to learn, and not enough time.
Idk shit about photography, but that last sentence IF they tried to really officially say that was the bullet you’re right.
See here’s the thing though, and they have known this for a long time, but it was further cemented by the JFK assassination.
You don’t HAVE to fool everyone just the majority.
All you have to do is make it convincing enough for Joe Blow and Peggy Sue to go „Hmmm yeah that’s probably right they know more about what they’re talking about than me.“
And then they go right back to the bar to play pool or watch the game.
Ok I just looked into it, and they’re saying 8 rounds were fired within 5 seconds.
So this ISN’T the bullet that hit him just one of them.
Its crazy that the bullet had to fly between his mouth and the microphone. He had crazy luck that day
Didnt people die from this? All of that is fake to you guys? Wtf when is something real
I’m like pretty sure someone hired a shooter and this was a warning call to choose JD or else
I’m still waiting for anyone to share a video from the perspective of the hundreds of people who were sitting on the other side, pointing their phones directly at that ear.
What if the bullet was an implant to control him? After this he was different, just a thought.
I used to be a professional photographer.
This is basically just a very lucky photo. Press photographers snap hundreds if not thousands of photos at an event like this because there will be lots which are messed up (person talking and their face all looking weird)
So more likely this photographer has photos just before and after which show no bullet.
To discuss the conspiracy though…. are we suggesting that a sniper took a shot at Trump and purposely missed??
Talking about tbat would bring attention to the shooter and I don’t think Donald wants that , he’s too egotistical.
First off wrong ear. Second chemtrail. …. You’re focused on the wrong conspiracy.
Tell that to the father who bled out next to his children