Ich wette 1000 Dollar, dass keiner der Astronauten zu irgendeinem Zeitpunkt seiner Reise ein Video von der Erde von einer Seite der Kapsel und dann vom Mond von der anderen Seite macht, in einem Video ungeschnitten. Ich wette, sie werden sich nicht dazu äußern, ob sie Sterne sehen oder nicht, und es uns zeigen.

    Das ist die Mutter aller Verschwörungsmenschen. Ich denke, dass er uns über einen der grundlegendsten Aspekte unserer Realität anlügt – unsere Fähigkeiten zur Weltraumforschung.

    Im Jahr 2026 haben wir endlich Menschen aus der Erdumlaufbahn geschickt – warum werden wir nicht mit einzigartigen Aufnahmen davon überschwemmt? Warum konnten die Apollo-Missionen von 1969 bis 1972 Aufnahmen eines Menschen auf dem Mond bis zur Erde übertragen, wir können aber nicht mehr als 20 Sekunden in minderwertiger, zerhackter Aufnahme von der Rakete bekommen, die die Erde verlässt? gefolgt von CGI-Renderings der Mission.

    Die Astronauten haben bereits über die atemberaubenden Ausblicke auf die Erde gesprochen, es jedoch nicht geschafft, ein einziges Video dieser Ausblicke für die Öffentlichkeit zu produzieren. Tausende von Satelliten im Orbit und keiner kann ein paar Bilder von der Kapsel machen, die ihr Zuhause verlässt?

    Ich denke, sie belügen uns über unsere Fähigkeiten in der Weltraumforschung.

    Von Economy-Commission-1

    Share.

    44 Kommentare

    1. Omnipotent720 on

      I agree with you, they most likely have more advanced technology hidden away

    2. FlightAvailable3760 on

      Cell phones don’t have “space shuttle” mode so they were forced to leave them at home. This is really Apple’s fault.

    3. HiTekLoLyfe on

      I don’t think y’all will ever be happy with whatever is shown so I’m not sure why you even bother critiquing this. I would imagine they are probably not in the business of taking a bunch of extra cameras and equipment up when every ounce creates the need for more fuel. I don’t know what you mean about stars? If you ever used a camera you know stars are hard to pick up with cameras unless you are set up properly.

    4. A real livestream would be from a phone and on social media. Raw footage. None of the cameras made for tv or movie production.

      When I flew to Korea from Alaska, I looked out my window to the left and saw the moon eye level and a whole night sky. When I looked out the other side, I could see the sun far off in the distance with daylight around it shining down on water.

      I was confused cuz how the hell could I see the sun and moon at the same time at night? With daylight? All I could think of was, maybe I am high enough to see over the top part of the globe?

      Now I know exactly why I saw night and day at the same time. And why I felt my heart in my stomach when I looked out the window the first time I flew when I was 11.

    5. Happiness-happppy on

      Thank you for this post, it’s crazy how trusting people are of all of this. It goes back to Enoch’s book and the gnostic text, they desire to hide the reality of the cosmos because they know if we discover we are living in a cosmic prison that has an escape that would be their end.

    6. 1980sumthing on

      U would think, for the most of earths population, unhindered 4k+ footage would be the most valuable thing they could bring back.

    7. I cant imagine how much education a person has to lack to question space programs. You think everything is a big lie made up by millions of people but as soon as you are presented with proof you flee like cockroaches when the lights get turned on

    8. CrackleDMan on

      Doesn’t even matter anymore.  Good fakes, bad fakes, nearly everyone just accepts the blatant lies.

    9. OriginalOmbre on

      Ok bot. Bet 100 in title then 1000 in narrative. No human can possibly expect astronauts to have cell phones for photos in space.

    10. Liberblancus on

      We are in a closed system. There is no space.
      The reason why they lie about it is to make people nihilist atheists, instead of having faith in God.
      The closed system imply the existence of a creator.
      This is why they call their missions appolo or artemis ( appolo twin conveniently ) which is synonymous of Satan in the Bible.
      This is also why nasa (strong h5377) mean to deceive/beguile in Hebrew and is the first thing the serpent do in Genesis.
      They keep this symbolism on and on.
      They also read the genesis during appolo 8, December 24 1968 that is Christmas eve, because this is what this is about.

      Hiding the Creator is what this is about.

    11. DigitalScythious on

      NASA is just trying to get ahead of the UAP hearings and Disclosure. Securing extra funding and trying to stay relevant. Every sector on earth has advanced except NASA. 60 years later still trying to do the same trick.

    12. Alsweets0609 on

      Those that wager like this don’t even have the funds. Even if they fulfil your request you’ll move the goalpost cause again……you don’t have the funds. 😂

      Bet they come back with some crazy footage of the dark side but you’ll play it off as cgi cause you’ve fought your adult life trying to convince others space is a big hoax and everyone’s in on it 🤦

    13. TrashFever78 on

      Do you think they have they’re cellphone with them? How dumb are you?

    14. AnInfiniteAmount on

      Probably because they don’t care about proving it. Enough people believe it, even with some „skeptics“ „convinced“ with lazy arguments like the one about the USSR would’ve disproved (as if they all werent on the same side. ) that they dont even need to put the effort in anymore. they’re definitely laughing their asses off in Florida like, „who cares if we haven’t convinced everyone, what are the ones that arent convinced gonna do?“

    15. Risenzealot on

      „in 1969-72 transmit footage of a man on the moon all the way back to earth, but we cant get more than a 20 second, low quality chopped up clip of the rocket leaving earth? followed by cgi renders of mission.“

      This 100% and it’s honestly the singular reason I have doubts over anything space related that NASA says. There is literally no reason what so ever we can’t get better footage of this stuff. If they could do it in 1969 there is zero excuse why they can’t in 2026.

      Spare me your weight concerns bull shit. They managed to figure out a way around those weight concerns in 1969 supposedly so why can’t they today?

      So we’re clear. I am not saying the moon landing was a hoax or I think the Earth is flat or anything like that. What I am saying is I truly don’t know which way I believe for sure.

    16. HalleluYahuah on

      We got 4kHD Mars shit and rovers and all that amazing tech- if you believe that- so why would be have the same great tech for something far closer? /s

    17. If im right, i think the battery would be the biggest isseu and some kf the sensors might cause weird info

    18. star_particles on

      I mean it’s a given they won’t show us the few videos that could prove they are actually doing what they are doing.

      Remember when the astronaut almost drowned in his spacesuit?…. Yeah.

      That being said look up Ashton Forbes on YouTube. He breaks down by reading department of defense papers and other scientific papers that shows we have had “ufo” technology since the 60s and have perfected it by now to the point we can teleport. My opinion is that they faked the moon footage and the other footage that they show us because that isn’t how we are exploring space. They need to give this false image that we are using rocket technology in 2026 instead of all the top secret anti gravity technology that is kept behind closed doors and is part of their breakaway civilization.

      They perfected this technology a long time ago and everything we are shown and all the ufo disclosure is just a psyop to hide how far Lockheed and Raytheon have really gotten.

      They figured out a branch of physics that they are hiding from the public as it does have the ability to
      Destroy the world because of the weapons that can be made from the technology. That is the only thing I do agree with on this whole hiding it from the public. There ARE groups of people that would use it for a weapon and we really can’t have that technology until we mature and evolve a bit as a species. As much as I hate that it definitely is true…

    19. YaSurLetsGoSeeYamcha on

      You could take this entire sub up in a shuttle and they’d still claim it’s a lie because the Bible doesn’t mention space or some shit lmao

    20. Well, using 50 year old tech, should make everybody question what Nasa allegedly did for decades and the whole narrative they push now.

    21. I don’t think their primary objective is to whip out their phones and record / take pictures of everything. They’re focused on their mission. These aren’t some tourists at Disneyland or influencers who record every minute of their lives.

    22. EhMapleMoose on

      I got spotty reception in rural counties, why would someone take their phone 300,000+Kms from earth?

      It’d be a useless brick out there. You think they brought spare USB-C charging cables and also have empty plugs to plug them into?

    23. HalleluYahuah on

      I read the symbology and pay attention to mundane details like THE DATE, THE NAMES OF THE ASTRONOTS, etc….

      It’s not looking good.

      April fools….Launch on a day tied to illusion vs truth… day of deception and foolery

      Wiseman… they were magi in the Bible. Magi root to magic as in illusion… again.

      Glover…. the one to wear gloves. The freemasons wear gloves. Gloves conceal your hands.

      Koch…alchemy related.

      Artemis is tired to initiation rites, goddess of thresholds….

      This is merely plausible symbology, but NASA ABSOLUTELY USES IT hense Artemis being used which is the polar twin to Apollo… the language of the YouKnowverse is symbolism.

      Anyway back to fitting my aluminum hat. I had to get a new one since my pizza gate one was retired.

    24. technotronica on

      LMAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣 why would they take their phones with them??? Jesus

    25. SomeSamples on

      I thought someone published a photo from earth from the capsule. It was really blurry though.

    26. Everyone judging op. Looks like the bots came out lmao. Let’s be real if you trust anything. NASA says or shows, then you mine as well believe trump too.

    27. 3rdeyenotblind on

      What comes out first…

      UNCUT Epstein vids

      Or

      UNCUT personal camera vids from space

      🤷‍♂️

      One matters, the other…not so much

    28. Even if you did get an uncut version, you still wouldn’t be satisfied as if you think it’s not possible that it must be doctored footage or images.

    29. It’s NASA they are obviously going to doctor every image, and lie about it. Let’s be real.

    Leave A Reply