Submission Statement: Bondi was given a subpoena to testify before congress regarding the Epstein files. Congressional republicans have opted instead for her to be fired as cover to evade testimony, as well as put someone with less baggage into the AG role. Personally I also think they’re going to paint Epstein as “Bondi’s problem” and make excuses to move past it and never talk about it again.
“A spokesperson for House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), however, argued that the committee could reverse course.
“Since Pam Bondi is no longer Attorney General, Chairman Comer will speak with Republican members and the Department of Justice about the status of the deposition subpoena and confer on next steps,” the spokesperson said.
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) the next day told CNN she was “absolutely” considering withdrawing her support after Democrats walked out of the meeting, saying it was “absolutely shameful to have her come in there willingly to answer anything that we want to ask, and to be treated that way. It just shows what’s to come.””
Hagus-McFee on
This is the explanation until I hear a better one.
thisisasetupisntit on
When you hear the truth you can feel it…
everydaycarrie on
She is still required to respond to the subpoena.
Might have been a very stupid move to fire her just before she has to appear.
ZWash300 on
Doesn’t she still have to appear?
LeftyMode on
And that makes perfect sense in a court of law. Crazy government we have here.
Granite66 on
If she is repositioned within government, then it’s pointless move. She will be subpoenaed. Is there a position within US government that would make it difficult to subpoena her by said committee? Figure intelligence whereby her lawyers can claim national security or a diplomatic position like ambassador. Otherwise, maybe quit the government for a corporate position offshore where she is unavailable for testimony?
yellowjackethokie on
I don’t think that’s how subpoenas work…is it?
QaddafiDuck01 on
Pretty sure the only way she can’t go before the subcommittee is if she goes to prison for it or is dead.
Cracknoreos on
Her crypto wallet just got filled-big time!
Squat_Cobbler89 on
I love how under oath is used like it’s serious. These mf mfs don’t care not a single one. All will lie
streetkiller on
How would her being a regular civilian keep her from having to appear before congress?
joshberry90 on
The only problem is that Bondi was named specifically in the request.
South-Rabbit-4064 on
That’s not how subpoenas work
Granted there could very well be a reason behind it involved in something, I just don’t think it was to shift pressure on her for a hearing. Even if republicans pull a „we don’t need her now, she’s been fired“, progressives and even some conservatives ready to break with Trump are going to push more now. Because she may be willing to spill.
They’ve already thought of this though as you can kinda see as Pam is already posting positively about this and Trump gushed about her as he was announcing firing her. Just think while it may not be what she wanted, promises or threats have been made
Electronic_Yak9821 on
This is a joke. There is no reality with these “files” and the outcome people want. This was a global blackmail operation ran by intelligence (and those who actually run the world) so what do people think can actually happen?
Aggravating_Act0417 on
Why would firing her prevent her from testifying?
Maybe they just don’t want the mess after she speaks.
Sufficient_Sell_6103 on
She’s going on an extended vacation to Venezuela right before she’s set to testify. „Private sector job“
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
17 Kommentare
Submission Statement: Bondi was given a subpoena to testify before congress regarding the Epstein files. Congressional republicans have opted instead for her to be fired as cover to evade testimony, as well as put someone with less baggage into the AG role. Personally I also think they’re going to paint Epstein as “Bondi’s problem” and make excuses to move past it and never talk about it again.
“A spokesperson for House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), however, argued that the committee could reverse course.
“Since Pam Bondi is no longer Attorney General, Chairman Comer will speak with Republican members and the Department of Justice about the status of the deposition subpoena and confer on next steps,” the spokesperson said.
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) the next day told CNN she was “absolutely” considering withdrawing her support after Democrats walked out of the meeting, saying it was “absolutely shameful to have her come in there willingly to answer anything that we want to ask, and to be treated that way. It just shows what’s to come.””
This is the explanation until I hear a better one.
When you hear the truth you can feel it…
She is still required to respond to the subpoena.
Might have been a very stupid move to fire her just before she has to appear.
Doesn’t she still have to appear?
And that makes perfect sense in a court of law. Crazy government we have here.
If she is repositioned within government, then it’s pointless move. She will be subpoenaed. Is there a position within US government that would make it difficult to subpoena her by said committee? Figure intelligence whereby her lawyers can claim national security or a diplomatic position like ambassador. Otherwise, maybe quit the government for a corporate position offshore where she is unavailable for testimony?
I don’t think that’s how subpoenas work…is it?
Pretty sure the only way she can’t go before the subcommittee is if she goes to prison for it or is dead.
Her crypto wallet just got filled-big time!
I love how under oath is used like it’s serious. These mf mfs don’t care not a single one. All will lie
How would her being a regular civilian keep her from having to appear before congress?
The only problem is that Bondi was named specifically in the request.
That’s not how subpoenas work
Granted there could very well be a reason behind it involved in something, I just don’t think it was to shift pressure on her for a hearing. Even if republicans pull a „we don’t need her now, she’s been fired“, progressives and even some conservatives ready to break with Trump are going to push more now. Because she may be willing to spill.
They’ve already thought of this though as you can kinda see as Pam is already posting positively about this and Trump gushed about her as he was announcing firing her. Just think while it may not be what she wanted, promises or threats have been made
This is a joke. There is no reality with these “files” and the outcome people want. This was a global blackmail operation ran by intelligence (and those who actually run the world) so what do people think can actually happen?
Why would firing her prevent her from testifying?
Maybe they just don’t want the mess after she speaks.
She’s going on an extended vacation to Venezuela right before she’s set to testify. „Private sector job“