Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. Submission Statement: Bondi was given a subpoena to testify before congress regarding the Epstein files. Congressional republicans have opted instead for her to be fired as cover to evade testimony, as well as put someone with less baggage into the AG role. Personally I also think they’re going to paint Epstein as “Bondi’s problem” and make excuses to move past it and never talk about it again.

      “A spokesperson for House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), however, argued that the committee could reverse course.

      “Since Pam Bondi is no longer Attorney General, Chairman Comer will speak with Republican members and the Department of Justice about the status of the deposition subpoena and confer on next steps,” the spokesperson said.

      Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) the next day told CNN she was “absolutely” considering withdrawing her support after Democrats walked out of the meeting, saying it was “absolutely shameful to have her come in there willingly to answer anything that we want to ask, and to be treated that way. It just shows what’s to come.””

    2. everydaycarrie on

      She is still required to respond to the subpoena.

      Might have been a very stupid move to fire her just before she has to appear.

    3. And that makes perfect sense in a court of law. Crazy government we have here.

    4. If she is repositioned within government, then it’s pointless move. She will be subpoenaed. Is there a position within US government that would make it difficult to subpoena her by said committee? Figure intelligence whereby her lawyers can claim national security or a diplomatic position like ambassador. Otherwise, maybe quit the government for a corporate position offshore where she is unavailable for testimony?

    5. QaddafiDuck01 on

      Pretty sure the only way she can’t go before the subcommittee is if she goes to prison for it or is dead.

    6. Squat_Cobbler89 on

      I love how under oath is used like it’s serious. These mf mfs don’t care not a single one. All will lie

    7. streetkiller on

      How would her being a regular civilian keep her from having to appear before congress?

    8. South-Rabbit-4064 on

      That’s not how subpoenas work

      Granted there could very well be a reason behind it involved in something, I just don’t think it was to shift pressure on her for a hearing. Even if republicans pull a „we don’t need her now, she’s been fired“, progressives and even some conservatives ready to break with Trump are going to push more now. Because she may be willing to spill.

      They’ve already thought of this though as you can kinda see as Pam is already posting positively about this and Trump gushed about her as he was announcing firing her. Just think while it may not be what she wanted, promises or threats have been made

    9. Electronic_Yak9821 on

      This is a joke. There is no reality with these “files” and the outcome people want. This was a global blackmail operation ran by intelligence (and those who actually run the world) so what do people think can actually happen?

    10. Aggravating_Act0417 on

      Why would firing her prevent her from testifying?

      Maybe they just don’t want the mess after she speaks.

    11. Sufficient_Sell_6103 on

      She’s going on an extended vacation to Venezuela right before she’s set to testify. „Private sector job“

    Leave A Reply