The bottom graphs look dem favoured until you look at the numbers…
Zigxy on
Would be nice if we could see the top donors together but with red and blue bars
abramthrust on
usually we equate fundraising success with election odds.
so with that in mind… not a good look for the Dems
apthereddit on
Why don’t the top 10 donors line up with the top by party? E.g. Andreesen and Horowitz donated 25M+ each but don’t show up by party. Uhlein donated 23.9M in total but more than that to republicans
Also would be interesting to see total donations by party and by geography
Jaasim99 on
To whom did Marc donate? I cannot find him either Demo or Rep spenders. Are there other alternatives?
ShitTalkingAssWipe on
It’s funny with how cheap dems are to be bought you would think this shit would have happened earlier
highvoltagelp on
How the hell is this even legal?
Conscious_Raisin_436 on
Republicans can spend what they want, they have a deep hole to climb out of with this Iran war. These gas prices are about to start hurting wallets badly, and people vote with their wallets.
JarryBohnson on
This is so insane, here in Québec political donations are capped at $200 CAD per person, per party, and we have a bit of a reputation for our politicians being corrupt. This is corruption on an absolutely stupefying scale.
Tommyblockhead20 on
This is not beautiful. Don’t use the same color to mean different things, there’s plenty of other colors you can make “Tech”. And don’t use didn’t scales for the donor graphs. Also there really should be a graph that has the top 10-20 donors by who they donated too. I’d rather have just that graph than these 3.
rejecttheHo on
You should really align the axis on the Dems and Republicans
rifleshooter on
NEA Advocacy Fund = teacher’s unions.
Blueboysixnine on
What’s beautiful about this data?
Optimoprimo on
If anyone is from Wisconsin like me and saw Chris Larson – its not our state senator from Milwaukee. He doesn’t have million dollar donation money.
14 Kommentare
The bottom graphs look dem favoured until you look at the numbers…
Would be nice if we could see the top donors together but with red and blue bars
usually we equate fundraising success with election odds.
so with that in mind… not a good look for the Dems
Why don’t the top 10 donors line up with the top by party? E.g. Andreesen and Horowitz donated 25M+ each but don’t show up by party. Uhlein donated 23.9M in total but more than that to republicans
Also would be interesting to see total donations by party and by geography
To whom did Marc donate? I cannot find him either Demo or Rep spenders. Are there other alternatives?
It’s funny with how cheap dems are to be bought you would think this shit would have happened earlier
How the hell is this even legal?
Republicans can spend what they want, they have a deep hole to climb out of with this Iran war. These gas prices are about to start hurting wallets badly, and people vote with their wallets.
This is so insane, here in Québec political donations are capped at $200 CAD per person, per party, and we have a bit of a reputation for our politicians being corrupt. This is corruption on an absolutely stupefying scale.
This is not beautiful. Don’t use the same color to mean different things, there’s plenty of other colors you can make “Tech”. And don’t use didn’t scales for the donor graphs. Also there really should be a graph that has the top 10-20 donors by who they donated too. I’d rather have just that graph than these 3.
You should really align the axis on the Dems and Republicans
NEA Advocacy Fund = teacher’s unions.
What’s beautiful about this data?
If anyone is from Wisconsin like me and saw Chris Larson – its not our state senator from Milwaukee. He doesn’t have million dollar donation money.
It’s this guy:
https://monroecap.com/team_member/chris-larson/