Frau soll 33.000 £ Online-William-Hill-Jackpot-Gewinn wegen „Panne“ zurückzahlen

https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-news/woman-pay-back-william-hill-jackpot-glitch-33000-846617-20260331

Von pppppppppppppppppd

15 Kommentare

  1. callsignhotdog on

    „Glitch“ on their end, its their technology, they should be liable. If they want the benefit of a fixed odds machine that they control, they have to accept the risk of bugs in their own system.

  2. MondeyMondey on

    Every time something like this happens, the person should get to keep it. Someone accidentally gets a 100x payment from their job, let em keep it! Someone accidentally gets an absurd tax rebate, let em keep it! I will be running for office under my new “let em keep it” initiative.

  3. Doesitmatters369 on

    When we win its glitch when we lose the system works absolutely fine lol
    Im a matched bettor and regularly profit from the bookies, been recently flagged up by the risk control department for completing a signup offer and make massive 60 quids out of bookies, threatened to have my account closed, winning forfeited and deposit confiscated lmao.

  4. Jaded_Strain_3753 on

    I hope these stories encourage people that play these types of “games” to stop playing

  5. georgialucy on

    Weird that we only hear about glitches when people win, seems to always be working when they lose!

  6. Far-Site-6477 on

    Bookies will say and do anything possible to stop them having to pay out. Bookies only like losers which to be fair is the vast majority of people who punt. I think if I was this woman I would have taken the 11% offer, gamcare myself and never play online slots again because you will never beat them in the long run.

  7. MaximusSydney on

    I wonder how the decided which of the winners were over and above the expected number of winners and which were not.

  8. Frosty_Customer_9243 on

    Why is it that glitches show up when someone wins, but never „O hey, here is the £100 back you gambled today, there was a glitch on the machine.“

  9. ThomasGullen on

    Can we have the numbers on how many refunds were processed for glitches on losing bets please before we entertain this?

  10. nice_knight on

    You mean a predatory company in a predatory industry acted unethically, I’m shocked…shocked… well actually not that shocked.

  11. That’s a shame, there seems to be a glitch on my banking app that stops me sending money back to them

  12. „Another man said he and his wife had been planning to clear debts of £30,000…“.

    Maybe he shouldn’t be gambling to begin with?

  13. William Hill are utter bastards, I used to work with a lot of high rollers and the barriers William Hill used to and still put up to stop users cashing out is unreal. They don’t have any upper limits for withdrawals but I’ve seen multiple instances where people have had fully verified accounts try to withdraw winning and William Hill have reverted the withdrawal back to the account for no reason, I knew a guy who won €80k in Italy but they wouldn’t allow him to withdraw and more than €3k per transaction (even though the website and other users allow you to withdraw more). If he tried to withdraw more the request would be reverted

  14. Late-Development-666 on

    If the woman in the article let WH take her to court, they’d have to detail how their online games work from a technical perspective of identifying winning players and what payout they get no? So they could open their games up to further scrutiny on how much more they weigh in the bookies favour?

Leave A Reply