Stellungnahme zur Stellungnahme: Aktuelle Gerichtsdokumente zeigen, dass die Kugel nicht aus dem Gewehr am Tatort stammte. Was ist wirklich los und warum? Deine Gedanken
Von RustyShackle4_
Stellungnahme zur Stellungnahme: Aktuelle Gerichtsdokumente zeigen, dass die Kugel nicht aus dem Gewehr am Tatort stammte. Was ist wirklich los und warum? Deine Gedanken
Von RustyShackle4_
19 Kommentare
I bet his ’security‘ from that day is shitting bricks right about now.
Not that it didn’t match. It looks like FBI wasn’t able to conclusively say it did match.
We knew this from the hole in his neck. Stupid bullshit.
Not surprising at all. I swear, whenever „they“ decide to kill somebody, it’s always a forever mystery. I dunno if it’s CIA, Mossad, billionaires, Trump. No idea. But the very day I heard about it, I said this was not done by a kid with his daddy’s rifle.
Said it almost immediately. A bullet from a Mauser, 30-06 or 8mm, at that distance is doing way more damage to the throat. Even a disassembled Muaser is not fitting into a Jansport backpack. The entire scenario they painted made no sense whatsoever… then when people started calling out the wound the answer was „man of steel stopped a bullet“ or some crap. The kid is a patsy.
What bullet though??!
WELL DUH NO SHOCKER THERE BUT EVERYONE KNEW THAT THE FIRST DAY..
Why lie? Certainly you know what you’re saying is a lie.
This is just an allegation by the defendents attorney. A typical challange and everyone’s acting like it is a proven fact. Not saying it is meritless just pointing out how people can’t follow facts.
Thats cause Mossad killed Kirk and Tyler probably got his brains fried Mk ultra style. they made him go on the roof but never shot a gun because why? Because he never shot a gun that day.
That’s not what they said, they just said they can’t conclusively prove that it came from the rifle at the scene because the bullet was damaged too severely. There’s a difference.
Didnt they repave the spot where he got shot? Almost as if they wanted to ensure no residue could be recovered. Very suspicious what they did to the crime scene.
Posted this link in the previous post about this.
https://x.com/FenixAmmunition/status/2038967492295434540?s=20
The defense is trying to claim something that isn’t conclusive is exculpatory. But no a bullet that fragments into dozens and dozens of pieces isn’t going to be able to be used for ballistic forensics.
Well, well, well
Cool now maybe focus on who fabricated and inserted them fake ass text messages into the case
Why do these posts never include a link to the source? Are there any rules to this sub besides, No crossposting?
Be careful with the misinformation. This headline is a flat out lie.
The actual report says „“which indicates that the ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson.“
They didn’t say it didn’t match, just that they couldn’t match it. There’s several reasons possible, like the bullet being too malformed.
Don’t fall for the red herring.
NBDNBGH
Literally the MAN leading bling sheep