Diese Karte zeigt den Anteil des Einkommens, den die Menschen in jeder Region Europas typischerweise für die Miete einer für ihre Region repräsentativen Standardwohnung mit 100 m² ausgeben. Es basiert auf durchschnittlichen Gehältern und typischen Wohnverhältnissen in der gesamten Region und nicht nur auf den Zahlen aus den Hauptstädten. Mit anderen Worten: Es spiegelt die allgemeine Erschwinglichkeit von Mietwohnungen in der Region wider und konzentriert sich nicht ausschließlich auf die teuersten städtischen Lagen.
Quelle: ESPON (2024)
Von gratiaetfides
14 Kommentare
Rent 100m2 where? Average price? In capital? Without this extra info its nonsense.
So if I am getting this right,you can rent more then 1000m² in belgium or less then 100m² in croatia with 2 same jobs(I mean same as in you and your partner do same jobs in croatia and belgium)?
r/PORTUGALCYKABLYAT
Is Poland that bad for renting a place?
This keeps getting reposted and it’s as much bullshit now as it was before. Their definition of income is something very close to GDP per capita which is just laughable. Their rent data comes from scraping rental classified ads which is beyond stupid for a dozen different reasons.
Well. I call bullshit.
Do you see the big red one in the west of Germany? That’s the Kreis Düren. A rural area in this region but nothing special. It’s no way standing this much out.
This is wrong
I just paid my rent in berlin and have €100 left
This is posted here all the time, but it is a very flawed metric.
For instance, 100m2 properties are fairly abundant in, for example, Belgium. As is renting overall. So renting such a property, even in Brussels, is not a huge luxery, and availability of such rentals is fairly high.
In Poland, the rental market overall is much smaller, and is pretty much confined to the big cities. Properties overall are smaller because the entire hosuing stock of most cities was destroyed during WWII, and the apartments that the communists rebuilt were fairly small. So, 100m2 rental properties in Poland, especially in cities, are extremely rare, and would basically all fall into the luxery category.
Thus, this is not an apples to apples comparison of the cost of renting based on purchasing power. It is basically a metric showing 1) where rental properties are larger on average, 2) where rental properties are more widely available, and 3) in the case of coastal Mediterranean locations, where there is strong rental pressure from tourists
POLAND STRONK 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱💪💪💪
I don’t understand. Here in Finland is oversupply (only in Europe) and rents are actually lowered and actually that is one rare thing is very affordable. Actually that map is somehow even reversed, because Helsinki is most expensive area (yes there is also high incomes), but still, all other Finland is very reasonable. Less income but also cheaper rents.
UE must ban residential housing as investment.
Come on. Milano should be at least purple. Who are you kidding?
Dalmatia (Croatia) should be in purple but still big shit because median salary in the region is around 1100-1200 eur. And It’s not just about the price—most apartments are rented out to tourists during the summer , so it’s hard to find any long-term housing at all.