ICE hat Agenten fälschlicherweise angewiesen, Menschen vor Einwanderungsgerichten zu verhaften, gibt das DOJ zu
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ice-immigration-court-arrests-new-york-lawsuit-b2945719.html
ICE hat Agenten fälschlicherweise angewiesen, Menschen vor Einwanderungsgerichten zu verhaften, gibt das DOJ zu
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ice-immigration-court-arrests-new-york-lawsuit-b2945719.html
27 Kommentare
„oops, my bad“ just doesn’t quite cover it
„Mistakenly“.
wait, what does this mean for the Wisconsin Judge who was charged with obstructing federal agents … if they were acting illegally?
>Donald Trump’s administration has falsely stated for nearly a year that [Immigration and Customs Enforcement](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ice-arrest-san-francisco-tsa-b2945411.html) officers can arrest people inside immigration courts, where agents [standing outside courtroom doors](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/new-york-school-student-ice-arrest-b2941280.html) have swiftly cuffed thousands of immigrants immediately after they left their hearings.
Falsely stated = lied
>“Based on our discussions with ICE today, this regrettable error appears to have occurred because of agency attorney error,” Clayton [wrote](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.646893/gov.uscourts.nysd.646893.77.0.pdf).
„Our bad!“
And there will be no accountability.
Translation: Tom Homan is gunning for Pam Bondi.
Homan is trying to move the operation underground so that it doesn’t get press attention and smartphone videos that go viral.
And he will want a few more necks to ax so that Trump can claim that everything is just fine in ICEland.
Susie Wiles is presumably fine with this and is probably hoping to add Miller to the staffing kill list.
„Mistakenly“….stephen miller straight up demanded they do it or get fired
This reminds me of how children use the word „accident“ when the predictable outcome arrives after constantly doing the thing they were asked not to.
sounds like then we should free everyone who was taken in an illegal manner, right? *right?*
„Mistake?“ you say? So someone is going to be fired and held accountable? or in the vernacular be thrown under the bus per se‘?
> mistakenly
I don’t think that means what you think it means.
The correct word is „intentionally“.
So what would that mean for Judge Dugan who was found guilty of felony obstruction for letting an immigration use a side door.
I call b.s.
They were given aggressive quotas and went for the low hanging fruit at the immigration courts.
I don’t see any accountability in an apology. Bondi needs a good spanking.
The midterms are coming! Quick backtrack our most heinous policies!
Oh cool are they going to release everyone arrested in immigration courts then?
It’s almost like the totally unqualified hacks with no training or experience don’t know what they’re doing.
There are people there who need arresting. They’re wearing „ICE“ patches and covering their faces.
we have to ditch this stupid idea that an immeasurable quality, like intention, has any effect on whether or not a crime has been committed. if we measure intention, it should have to do with sentencing, not guilt.
„mistakenly“
It wasn’t a mistake. Let’s be honest.
What the fuck happened to journalists’ balls? Are they all fucking eunuchs now??????
Mistakenly. THEY SAID THEY WOULD DO IT DURING HOUSE OVERSIGHT.
WHAT THE SHIT IS WRONG WITH YOU, JOURNALISTS. YOU SUCK. YOU ARE MAKING THIS WORSE. IF YOU DONT DO **WHAT YOUR LITERAL FUNCTION IS IN SOCIETY** WHY DOES YOUR JOB EXIST?
Ask yourself: in 10 years, is this an article I would tell my kids I wrote and be proud of it? Could you justify this article in front of your church, live? Could you put this article on your gravestone as “this is my proudest achievement!”
If the answer is NO to any of these: the what the fuck are you doing.
Mistakenly is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
Uh-oh somebody must have figured out that their protection isn’t going to last very much longer. I’m seeing a ton of backpedaling from the Department of war and the Department of justice recently.
Yes the same people who scream about immigrants following the law. This was a demonstration of what happens to those who followed the law.
„mistakenly“
Yeah, right.
You’re going to see the Trump administration start walking back a lot of the immigration stuff hoping that it changes the narrative quickly and definitively before the election. This is a sign of that.
They are really hoping that it’s enough for a lot of Americans to think the issue is solved. I think it’s also strategically a way for conservatives to be able to more realistically claim that everybody else is being hyperbolic about how immigration has been handled this last year. Gives them more solid examples to say crap like „Trump doesn’t support that policy, so I don’t know what you’re talking about“